Literature DB >> 14685810

Human corticospinal excitability during a precued reaction time paradigm.

Steven McMillan1, Vincent Nougier, Winston D Byblow.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the time-course of corticospinal excitability during reaction time (RT), and compare the excitability when a precue provided information regarding both the direction and extent of the upcoming movement ('Full' condition), specified the direction of the upcoming movement only ('Direction' condition), or provided no information at all ('None' condition). Ten healthy, right-handed subjects performed a four-choice RT task that involved flexion and extension of dominant wrist. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was presented at random intervals over a period of 120 ms prior to the subject's average non-stimulated voluntary electromyography (EMG) activity onset. We found that there was a significant relationship between motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and TMS onset when both the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) acted as an agonist. This relationship could be explained using the sigmoidal Boltzmann equation. The slope for the relationship did not differ between the Full and Direction conditions, suggesting that corticospinal excitability is not altered in the specification of movement extent. Both these conditions differed significantly from the None condition. The modulation of corticospinal excitability appeared greater in the FCR than in the ECR. There was a significant delay in RT the closer in time TMS was presented with respect to EMG onset. During extension, there was no difference in slope between the three conditions, whereas during flexion the slope was greater in the None condition than in the Direction condition, which was in turn greater than in the Full condition. This was mirrored in the relationship between agonist MEP amplitude and TMS onset for both muscles. It is possible that the gain of the corticospinal tract is increased in the conditions in which less information is provided in the precue to partly compensate for the increase in RT, which comes as a result of the additional processing required in those conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14685810     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1772-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  L Leocani; L G Cohen; E M Wassermann; K Ikoma; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Time-varying changes in corticospinal excitability accompanying the triphasic EMG pattern in humans.

Authors:  C D MacKinnon; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cortico-spinal inhibition reflects time but not event preparation: neural mechanisms of preparation dissociated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  T Hasbroucq; A Osman; C A Possamaï; B Burle; S Carron; D Dépy; S Latour; I Mouret
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1999-04

4.  Interruption of motor programmes by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in man.

Authors:  J C Rothwell; B L Day; P D Thompson; C D Marsden
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  Time course of corticospinal excitability in reaction time and self-paced movements.

Authors:  R Chen; Z Yaseen; L G Cohen; M Hallett
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.422

6.  Delay in the execution of voluntary movement by electrical or magnetic brain stimulation in intact man. Evidence for the storage of motor programs in the brain.

Authors:  B L Day; J C Rothwell; P D Thompson; A Maertens de Noordhout; K Nakashima; K Shannon; C D Marsden
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement.

Authors:  E V Evarts
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent.

Authors:  D A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1980-12

10.  Enhancement of motor cortical excitability in humans by non-invasive electrical stimulation appears prior to voluntary movement.

Authors:  A Starr; M Caramia; F Zarola; P M Rossini
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07
View more
  7 in total

1.  Jaw movement alters the reaction of human jaw muscles to incisor stimulation.

Authors:  Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-03       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Corticomotor excitability during a choice-hand reaction time task.

Authors:  Steven McMillan; Richard B Ivry; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.

Authors:  Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Threshold position control of anticipation in humans: a possible role of corticospinal influences.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Nicolas A Turpin; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Interactions between imagined movement and the initiation of voluntary movement: a TMS study.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Jennifer A Stevens; W Zev Rymer
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Modulation of corticospinal output in agonist and antagonist proximal arm muscles during motor preparation.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Martin Gagné; Laurent J Bouyer; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Changes in corticospinal excitability and the direction of evoked movements during motor preparation: a TMS study.

Authors:  Gijs van Elswijk; Willemijn D Schot; Dick F Stegeman; Sebastiaan Overeem
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.