Literature DB >> 14683545

Brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: intraoperative brainstem auditory evoked potential changes and warning values to prevent hearing loss--prospective study in a consecutive series of 84 patients.

Gustavo Polo1, Catherine Fischer, Marc P Sindou, Vincent Marneffe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The nerve function of Cranial Nerve VIII is at risk during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm. Intraoperative monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) can be a useful tool to decrease the danger of hearing loss. The aim of this study was 1) to assess the side effects of surgery on hearing and describe the main intraoperative BAEP changes observed in the authors' series, and 2) to define warning values beyond which the probability of hearing impairment rises significantly. These values were calculated by correlating the (possible) postoperative hearing disturbances evaluated in terms of pure tone average with intraoperative BAEP changes (especially delay in Wave V latency).
METHODS: This series included 84 consecutive patients affected with hemifacial spasm who underwent microvascular decompression during which BAEPs were monitored. During surgery, Wave I, I to V interpeak interval, latency, and amplitude of Wave V were recorded and measured. Auditory function was studied before and after surgery and expressed as a pure tone average in all patients. Then, correlations were made between hearing impairment after surgery and intraoperative BAEP changes in an attempt to define warning values.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (88%) had no hearing loss after surgery (Group 1). Eight patients (9.5%) had hearing impairment with a decrease in pure tone average of more than 20 dB (Group 2). Two patients (2.3%) experienced a definitive and complete hearing loss on the side operated on (Group 3). Among intraoperative BAEP changes, latency of Peak V was the most frequently observed and the most significant phenomenon, especially during cerebellar retraction and the decompression step of the microvascular decompression procedure. In the group of patients without hearing loss (Group 1), the mean delay in latency of Peak V was 0.61 millisecond (standard deviation, +/-0.36 ms); in the group with hearing decrease (Group 2), the mean delay was 1.05 milliseconds (standard deviation, +/-0.64 ms); and in the group with deafness (Group 3), Wave V was abolished.
CONCLUSION: From a practical standpoint, three warning values, based on delay in latency of Peak V, were established for use during surgery: an initial one at 0.4 millisecond ("watching" signal) at the safety limit; a second one at 0.6 millisecond (risk "warning" signal), which is the mean value corresponding to the group of patients without postoperative hearing loss; and an ultimate one at 1 millisecond ("critical" warning), before irreversibility. These warnings should help the surgeon to avoid or correct maneuvers that are dangerous for hearing function, which is mandatory in functional surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14683545     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000097268.90620.07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  13 in total

1.  Postoperative complications of microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm: lessons from experience of 2040 cases.

Authors:  Min Ho Lee; Tae Keun Jee; Jeong Ah Lee; Kwan Park
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Hemifacial spasm: a neurosurgical perspective.

Authors:  Doo-Sik Kong; Kwan Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-11-20

3.  Neurotologic Complications Following Microvascular Decompression: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Matthew Bartindale; Ayah Mohamed; Jason Bell; Matthew Kircher; Jacqueline Hill; Douglas Anderson; John Leonetti
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-14

Review 4.  [Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve function during cerebello-pontine angle surgery].

Authors:  S Rampp; T Rahne; S K Plontke; C Strauss; J Prell
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  The Incidence of Early Postoperative Conductive Hearing Loss after Microvascular Decompression of Hemifacial Spasm.

Authors:  Tingting Ying; Parthasarathy Thirumala; Paul Gardner; Miguel Habeych; Donald Crammond; Jeffrey Balzer
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2015-05-22

Review 6.  Advances in Intraoperative Neurophysiology During Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Hemifacial Spasm.

Authors:  Byung-Euk Joo; Jun-Soon Kim; Vedran Deletis; Kyung Seok Park
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 2.566

7.  Interaural Difference of Wave V Predicting Postoperative Hearing in Gardner-Robertson Class II Acoustic Neuroma Patients.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Keiji Takemura; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2013-06-13

Review 8.  Hearing Loss following Posterior Fossa Microvascular Decompression: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Matthew Bartindale; Matthew Kircher; William Adams; Neelam Balasubramanian; Jeffrey Liles; Jason Bell; John Leonetti
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  ASNM position statement: intraoperative monitoring of auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  William Hal Martin; Mark M Stecker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.977

10.  BAER suppression during posterior fossa dural opening.

Authors:  Christopher B Shields; Lisa B E Shields; Yi Dan Jiang; Tom Yao; Yi Ping Zhang; David A Sun
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.