Literature DB >> 14681300

Defining haplotype blocks and tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the human genome.

Thomas G Schulze1, Kui Zhang, Yu-Sheng Chen, Nirmala Akula, Fengzhu Sun, Francis J McMahon.   

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the genome is organized into blocks of haplotypes, and efforts to create a genome-wide haplotype map of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are already underway. Haplotype blocks are defined algorithmically and to date several algorithms have been proposed. However, little is known about their relative performance in real data or about the impact of allele frequencies and parameter choices on the detection of haplotype blocks and the markers that tag them. Here we present a formal comparison of two major algorithms, a linkage disequilibrium (LD)-based method and a dynamic programming algorithm (DPA), in three chromosomal regions differing in gene content and recombination rate. The two methods produced strikingly different results. DPA identified fewer and larger haplotype blocks as well as a smaller set of tag SNPs than the LD method. For both methods, the results were strongly dependent on the allele frequency. Decreasing the minor allele frequency led to an up to 3.7-fold increase in the number of haplotype blocks and tag SNPs. Definition of haploytpe blocks and tag SNPs was also sensitive to parameter changes, but the results could not be reconciled simply by parameter adjustment. These results show that two major methods for detecting haplotype blocks and tag SNPs can produce different results in the same data and that these results are sensitive to marker allele frequencies and parameter choices. More information is needed to guide the choice of method, marker allele frequencies, and parameters in the development of a haplotype map.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14681300     DOI: 10.1093/hmg/ddh035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mol Genet        ISSN: 0964-6906            Impact factor:   6.150


  11 in total

1.  A sparse marker extension tree algorithm for selecting the best set of haplotype tagging single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Authors:  Ke Hao; Simin Liu; Tianhua Niu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 2.  Prospects and pitfalls in whole genome association studies.

Authors:  Robert W Lawrence; David M Evans; Lon R Cardon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Comparison of ENCODE region SNPs between Cebu Filipino and Asian HapMap samples.

Authors:  Amanda F Marvelle; Leslie A Lange; Li Qin; Yunfei Wang; Ethan M Lange; Linda S Adair; Karen L Mohlke
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.172

Review 4.  Mapping quantitative trait loci in humans: achievements and limitations.

Authors:  Partha P Majumder; Saurabh Ghosh
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Investigation of the relationship between CTLA4 and the tumor suppressor RASSF1A and the possible mediating role of STAT4 in a cohort of Egyptian patients infected with hepatitis C virus with and without hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nermin A Ali; Nadia M Hamdy; Abdullah A Gibriel; Hala O El Mesallamy
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.574

6.  Analysis of concordance of different haplotype block partitioning algorithms.

Authors:  Amit R Indap; Gabor T Marth; Craig A Struble; Peter Tonellato; Michael Olivier
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  A model-based approach to selection of tag SNPs.

Authors:  Pierre Nicolas; Fengzhu Sun; Lei M Li
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Assessing the power of tag SNPs in the mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL) with extremal and random samples.

Authors:  Kui Zhang; Fengzhu Sun
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.797

9.  Characterisation of the genomic architecture of human chromosome 17q and evaluation of different methods for haplotype block definition.

Authors:  Eleftheria Zeggini; Anne Barton; Stephen Eyre; Daniel Ward; William Ollier; Jane Worthington; Sally John
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 2.797

10.  Haplotype block partitioning as a tool for dimensionality reduction in SNP association studies.

Authors:  Cristian Pattaro; Ingo Ruczinski; Danièle M Fallin; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.