Literature DB >> 14681125

Musicians versus nonmusicians. A neurophysiological approach.

Luisa Lopez1, Reinhart Jurgens, Volker Diekmann, Wolfgang Becker, Sibille Ried, Berta Grozinger, Sergio Nicola Erne.   

Abstract

The ability to perceive sounds and correctly categorize them within a scale is the result of the interaction between inherited capabilities and acquired rules. If a subject listens to a melody, occasional and unexpected endings of the melody typically evoke characteristic auditory evoked responses in the latency range of 300-400 ms (P300). Also, earlier stages of auditory information processing have been exhaustively investigated by means of mismatch negativity (MMN), a deflection that occurs in the auditory evoked response at a latency of about 200 ms, whenever a deviance is randomly inserted in a series of otherwise equal stimuli. Conceivably, perceptual deviations could also be detected against expectancies that are based on abstract rules; introspective experience suggests that such deviations may also elicit fast intuitive responses that typically initiate processes of analytical reasoning for confirmation. In music, the physical features of the stimulus are, in fact, always changing, because the melodic contour consists of a series of notes with different pitch characteristics. In such a condition, a typical mismatch negativity would not be evoked on the basis of physical deviance, but rather of criteria involving the musical contour of the stimulus. In this study, 20 healthy subjects (10 nonmusicians and 10 musicians) underwent auditory stimulation (tone, chord, chord sequence, Mozart and Bach melodies) and both electrical and magnetic recordings. Clear N1 was recorded for all paradigms, in all subjects; MMN and P300 were also recorded, and their amplitudes and latencies were significantly correlated with the musicality score and with the paradigm's difficulty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14681125     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1284.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  10 in total

1.  Effects of musical training on sound pattern processing in high-school students.

Authors:  Wenjung Wang; Laura Staffaroni; Errold Reid; Mitchell Steinschneider; Elyse Sussman
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 1.675

2.  Cortical encoding of pitch contour changes in cochlear implant users: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  Fawen Zhang; Chelsea Benson; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Stimulus experience modifies auditory neuromagnetic responses in young and older listeners.

Authors:  Bernhard Ross; Kelly Tremblay
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Electromagnetic correlates of musical expertise in processing of tone patterns.

Authors:  Anja Kuchenbuch; Evangelos Paraskevopoulos; Sibylle C Herholz; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cortical plasticity elicited by acoustically cued monetary losses: an ERP study.

Authors:  Aleksei Gorin; Elena Krugliakova; Vadim Nikulin; Aleksandra Kuznetsova; Victoria Moiseeva; Vasily Klucharev; Anna Shestakova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Mismatch Responses Evoked by Sound Pattern Violation in the Songbird Forebrain Suggest Common Auditory Processing With Human.

Authors:  Chihiro Mori; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Cortical mapping of mismatch negativity with deviance detection property in rat.

Authors:  Tomoyo Isoguchi Shiramatsu; Ryohei Kanzaki; Hirokazu Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mismatch negativity latency and cognitive function in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Christian Kärgel; Gudrun Sartory; Daniela Kariofillis; Jens Wiltfang; Bernhard W Müller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Contralateral Noise Stimulation Delays P300 Latency in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Thalita Ubiali; Milaine Dominici Sanfins; Leticia Reis Borges; Maria Francisca Colella-Santos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cortical inhibition effect in musicians and non-musicians using P300 with and without contralateral stimulation.

Authors:  Camila Maia Rabelo; Ivone Ferreira Neves-Lobo; Caroline Nunes Rocha-Muniz; Thalita Ubiali; Eliane Schochat
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.