BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based research has been criticized for not being relevant to the real world of patient care in the community, mainly because participants in research studies are dissimilar to those typically seen in every day practice. This article examines recruitment difficulties, and identifies the main reasons why patients with heart failure declined to participate in a research trial. METHODS:Postal survey of potential trial participants (n=667), at time of recruitment. Analysis of (1) clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents and nonrespondents to survey, and decliners and consenters to participation in a randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between respondents and nonrespondents in respect to sociodemographic or clinical variables. Males (OR=1.58, CI=1.04-2.41), younger patients (OR=1.05, CI=1.03-1.08), and those prescribed an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (OR=1.68, CI=1.10-2.57) were significantly more likely to consent to participate. Main reasons for nonparticipation were perceptions of being too old, too unwell, or too busy. CONCLUSIONS: Explanations of the purpose of research need to counter against perceptions among participants and clarify the benefits and disadvantages of participating in an intervention study when unwell. Study design should recognize that many elderly patients have busy lives and caring responsibilities. Financial support for participation should be considered.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Evidence-based research has been criticized for not being relevant to the real world of patient care in the community, mainly because participants in research studies are dissimilar to those typically seen in every day practice. This article examines recruitment difficulties, and identifies the main reasons why patients with heart failure declined to participate in a research trial. METHODS: Postal survey of potential trial participants (n=667), at time of recruitment. Analysis of (1) clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of respondents and nonrespondents to survey, and decliners and consenters to participation in a randomized controlled trial. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between respondents and nonrespondents in respect to sociodemographic or clinical variables. Males (OR=1.58, CI=1.04-2.41), younger patients (OR=1.05, CI=1.03-1.08), and those prescribed an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (OR=1.68, CI=1.10-2.57) were significantly more likely to consent to participate. Main reasons for nonparticipation were perceptions of being too old, too unwell, or too busy. CONCLUSIONS: Explanations of the purpose of research need to counter against perceptions among participants and clarify the benefits and disadvantages of participating in an intervention study when unwell. Study design should recognize that many elderly patients have busy lives and caring responsibilities. Financial support for participation should be considered.
Authors: Shannon M Dunlay; Nilay D Shah; Qian Shi; Bruce Morlan; Holly VanHouten; Kirsten Hall Long; Véronique L Roger Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2010-12-07
Authors: Marsha N Wittink; David Oslin; Kathryn A Knott; James C Coyne; Joseph J Gallo; Cynthia Zubritsky Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Shannon M Dunlay; Margaret M Redfield; Susan A Weston; Terry M Therneau; Kirsten Hall Long; Nilay D Shah; Véronique L Roger Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jacques J X R Geraets; Imelda J M de Groot; Mariëlle E J B Goossens; Camiel P C de Bruijn; Rob A de Bie; Wim J A van den Heuvel; Geert-Jan Dinant Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Kate Jolly; Rod S Taylor; Gregory Y H Lip; Mick Davies; Russell Davis; Jonathan Mant; Sally Singh; Sheila Greenfield; Jackie Ingram; Jane Stubley; Stirling Bryan; Andrew Stevens Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: I Vaartjes; A W Hoes; J B Reitsma; A de Bruin; D E Grobbee; A Mosterd; M I Bots Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Claire S Leathem; Margaret E Cupples; Mary C Byrne; Mary O'Malley; Ailish Houlihan; Andrew W Murphy; Susan M Smith Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2009-06-19 Impact factor: 4.615