Literature DB >> 14675647

Field and laboratory arsenic speciation methods and their application to natural-water analysis.

A J Bednar1, J R Garbarino, M R Burkhardt, J F Ranville, T R Wildeman.   

Abstract

The toxic and carcinogenic properties of inorganic and organic arsenic species make their determination in natural water vitally important. Determination of individual inorganic and organic arsenic species is critical because the toxicology, mobility, and adsorptivity vary substantially. Several methods for the speciation of arsenic in groundwater, surface-water, and acid mine drainage sample matrices using field and laboratory techniques are presented. The methods provide quantitative determination of arsenite [As(III)], arsenate [As(V)], monomethylarsonate (MMA), dimethylarsinate (DMA), and roxarsone in 2-8 min at detection limits of less than 1 microg arsenic per liter (microg As L(-1)). All the methods use anion exchange chromatography to separate the arsenic species and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry as an arsenic-specific detector. Different methods were needed because some sample matrices did not have all arsenic species present or were incompatible with particular high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) mobile phases. The bias and variability of the methods were evaluated using total arsenic, As(III), As(V), DMA, and MMA results from more than 100 surface-water, groundwater, and acid mine drainage samples, and reference materials. Concentrations in test samples were as much as 13,000 microg As L(-1) for As(III) and 3700 microg As L(-1) for As(V). Methylated arsenic species were less than 100 microg As L(-1) and were found only in certain surface-water samples, and roxarsone was not detected in any of the water samples tested. The distribution of inorganic arsenic species in the test samples ranged from 0% to 90% As(III). Laboratory-speciation method variability for As(III), As(V), MMA, and DMA in reagent water at 0.5 microg As L(-1) was 8-13% (n=7). Field-speciation method variability for As(III) and As(V) at 1 microg As L(-1) in reagent water was 3-4% (n=3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14675647     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  14 in total

Review 1.  Arsenic speciation analysis in water samples: a review of the hyphenated techniques.

Authors:  Ewa Terlecka
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Arsenic contamination of natural waters in San Juan and La Pampa, Argentina.

Authors:  J O'Reilly; M J Watts; R A Shaw; A L Marcilla; N I Ward
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Extraction of arsenate and arsenite species from soils and sediments.

Authors:  Myron Georgiadis; Yong Cai; Helena M Solo-Gabriele
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Arsenic distribution in water/sediment system of Sevojno.

Authors:  Snežana Aksentijević; Jelena Kiurski; Milica Vučinić Vasić
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Field based speciation of arsenic in UK and Argentinean water samples.

Authors:  M J Watts; J O'Reilly; A L Marcilla; R A Shaw; N I Ward
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Design and development of an automated flow injection instrument for the determination of arsenic species in natural waters.

Authors:  Grady Hanrahan; Tina K Fan; Melanie Kantor; Keith Clark; Steven Cardenas; Darrell W Guillaume; Crist S Khachikian
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.523

7.  An assessment of sampling, preservation, and analytical procedures for arsenic speciation in potentially contaminated waters.

Authors:  Youn-Tae Kim; Hyeon Yoon; Cheolho Yoon; Nam-Chil Woo
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Thioarsenite Detection and Implications for Arsenic Transport in Groundwater.

Authors:  Richard T Wilkin; Robert G Ford; Lisa M Costantino; Randall R Ross; Douglas G Beak; Kirk G Scheckel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 9.  Application of hyphenated techniques in speciation analysis of arsenic, antimony, and thallium.

Authors:  Rajmund Michalski; Sebastian Szopa; Magdalena Jabłońska; Aleksandra Łyko
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

Review 10.  Arsenic, Antimony, Chromium, and Thallium Speciation in Water and Sediment Samples with the LC-ICP-MS Technique.

Authors:  Magdalena Jabłońska-Czapla
Journal:  Int J Anal Chem       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 1.885

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.