Literature DB >> 14675351

Relation between FIGO stage, primary tumor volume, and presence of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients referred for radiotherapy.

K Narayan1, A F McKenzie, R J Hicks, R Fisher, D Bernshaw, S Bau.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to determine, firstly, the relationship between FIGO stage and various tumor parameters determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and, secondly, whether any of these parameters were predictors of lymph node metastases as determined by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in cervical cancer patients referred for radiotherapy. In 70 consecutive patients, both PET and MRI visualized all primary tumors except for one previously removed by cone biopsy. While clinical diameter and MRI-derived diameter showed a significant relationship between these two measurements (r = 0.70; P < 0.001) there was a large variability in MRI diameter for each FIGO stage and wide overlap. The average volume of primary cervical tumor on MRI was 60 cc (5-256). In FIGO stages, I, II, III and IV, uterine body involvement was present in 58%, 73%, 88%, and 100% of 19, 30, 16, and 5 patients, respectively (Ptrend= 0.015). Node positivity on FDG PET was present in 11% of patients without uterine body extension, but increased to 75% in those with uterine involvement. Average tumor volume in node-negative patients was 49 cc (5-186). Average tumor volume in node-positive patients was 69 cc (8-256). There was a significant association between nodal involvement and both FIGO stage (P = 0.018) and uterine body involvement (P < 0.001), but tumor volume and longitudinal MRI diameter were not statistically significant in unifactor predictors of nodal involvement. In multivariate analysis only uterine body extension, however, was independently related to the risk of nodal involvement. In conclusion, MRI provides noninvasive tumor size evaluation and can also demonstrate invasion of the uterine body that appears to be associated with an increased risk of nodal metastasis. This may provide clinically important prognostic information not available from current FIGO staging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14675351     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13026.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  10 in total

1.  Staging of uterine cervical cancer with MRI: guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Authors:  Corinne Balleyguier; E Sala; T Da Cunha; A Bergman; B Brkljacic; F Danza; R Forstner; B Hamm; R Kubik-Huch; C Lopez; R Manfredi; J McHugo; L Oleaga; K Togashi; K Kinkel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Nonsurgical management of cervical cancer: locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic disease, survivorship, and beyond.

Authors:  Helen J Mackay; Lari Wenzel; Linda Mileshkin
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

Review 3.  Current imaging strategies for the evaluation of uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Charis Bourgioti; Konstantinos Chatoupis; Lia Angela Moulopoulos
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

4.  Early invasive cervical cancer: MRI and CT predictors of lymphatic metastases in the ACRIN 6651/GOG 183 intergroup study.

Authors:  Donald G Mitchell; Bradley Snyder; Fergus Coakley; Caroline Reinhold; Gillian Thomas; Marco A Amendola; Lawrence H Schwartz; Paula Woodward; Harpreet Pannu; Mostafa Atri; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Imaging of endometrial and cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shilpa Patel; Sidath H Liyanage; Anju Sahdev; Andrea G Rockall; Rodney H Reznek
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-09-28

6.  Contribution of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy with sentinel node biopsy in patients with IB2-IIB cervical cancer.

Authors:  E Chéreau; J-G Feron; M Ballester; C Coutant; C Bezu; R Rouzier; E Touboul; E Daraï
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Ultrasound guided conformal brachytherapy of cervix cancer: survival, patterns of failure, and late complications.

Authors:  Kailash Narayan; Sylvia van Dyk; David Bernshaw; Pearly Khaw; Linda Mileshkin; Srinivas Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 8.  Imaging and cancer of the cervix in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  J Olpin; L Chuang; J Berek; D Gaffney
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-07-20

9.  Correlation between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Pretreatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Their Predictive Significance in Cervical Carcinoma Patients Referred for Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Chunyu Liang; Zhiyuan Xu; Xinping Shen; Kusheng Wu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  The Number of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes and Multiple Groups of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis Influence Prognosis in Stage IA-IIB Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Li-Jun Zhao; Ming-Zhu Li; Ming-Xia Li; Jian-Liu Wang; Li-Hui Wei
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.