Literature DB >> 14674576

Using Internet discussion boards as virtual focus groups.

Margaret F Moloney1, Alexa S Dietrich, Ora Strickland, Stuart Myerburg.   

Abstract

While the potential of Internet-based qualitative research methods is substantial, such methods are not without their problems. Some of these methodological challenges are unique to the medium, while others are similar to those of more traditional qualitative methods. This article presents some of these methodological challenges, and explores some of the issues involved in using on-line discussion boards as virtual focus groups in a study of perimenopausal women with migraines. Design of the study and its advantages and disadvantages are discussed, including the role of the moderator. Some of the problems encountered included potential for misunderstandings due to limits of written communications, and difficulty encouraging participation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14674576     DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200310000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci        ISSN: 0161-9268            Impact factor:   1.824


  9 in total

1.  Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.

Authors:  Sari L Reisner; Renee K Randazzo; Jaclyn M White Hughto; Sarah Peitzmeier; L Zachary DuBois; Dana J Pardee; Elliot Marrow; Sarah McLean; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2017-05-04

2.  A new approach to the measurement of adaptive behavior: development of the PEDI-CAT for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Jessica M Kramer; Wendy J Coster; Ying-Chia Kao; Anne Snow; Gael I Orsmond
Journal:  Phys Occup Ther Pediatr       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.360

3.  Recommendations for internet-based qualitative health research with hard-to-reach populations.

Authors:  J Michael Wilkerson; Alex Iantaffi; Jeremy A Grey; Walter O Bockting; B R Simon Rosser
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2014-03-12

4.  Prophylactic treatment of migraine; the patient's view, a qualitative study.

Authors:  Frans Dekker; Arie Knuistingh Neven; Boukje Andriesse; David Kernick; Ria Reis; Michel D Ferrari; Willem J J Assendelft
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 5.  Cluster headache: a review of online resources for patients and clinicians.

Authors:  B Lee Peterlin; Eduardo Gambini-Suárez; Morris Levin
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2007-04

6.  Advantages of asynchronous online focus groups and face-to-face focus groups as perceived by child, adolescent and adult participants: a survey study.

Authors:  Marieke Zwaanswijk; Sandra van Dulmen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-10-24

7.  Utilization of online focus groups to include mothers: A use-case design, reflection, and recommendations.

Authors:  Kara Skelton; Retta Evans; Jenna LaChenaye; Jonathan Amsbary; Martha Wingate; Laura Talbott
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2018-06-06

8.  Young patients', parents', and survivors' communication preferences in paediatric oncology: results of online focus groups.

Authors:  Marieke Zwaanswijk; Kiek Tates; Sandra van Dulmen; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Willem A Kamps; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Online focus groups as a tool to collect data in hard-to-include populations: examples from paediatric oncology.

Authors:  Kiek Tates; Marieke Zwaanswijk; Roel Otten; Sandra van Dulmen; Peter M Hoogerbrugge; Willem A Kamps; Jozien M Bensing
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.615

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.