Literature DB >> 14674574

Measurement issues related to data collection on the World Wide Web.

Ora L Strickland1, Margaret F Moloney, Alexa S Dietrich, Stuart Myerburg, George A Cotsonis, Robert V Johnson.   

Abstract

As the World Wide Web has become more prominent as a mode of communication, it has opened up new possibilities for research data collection. This article identifies measurement issues that occur with Internet data collection that are relevant to qualitative and quantitative research approaches as they occurred in a triangulated Internet study of perimenopausal women with migraine headaches. Issues associated with quantitative data collection over the Internet include (a) selecting and designing Internet data collection protocols that adequately address study aims while also taking advantage of the Internet, (b) ensuring the reliability and validity of Internet data collected, (c) adapting quantitative paper-and-pencil data collection protocols for the Internet, (d) making Internet data collection practical for respondents and researchers, and (e) ensuring the quality of quantitative data collected. Qualitative data collection over the Internet needs to remain true to the philosophical stance of the qualitative approach selected. Researcher expertise in qualitative data collection must be combined with expertise in computer technology and information services if data are to be of ultimate quality The advantages and limitations of collecting qualitative data in real time or at a later time are explored, as well as approaches to enhance qualitative data collection over the Internet. It was concluded that like any research approach or method, Internet data collection requires considerable creativity, expertise, and planning to take advantage of the technology for the collection of reliable and valid research data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14674574     DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200310000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci        ISSN: 0161-9268            Impact factor:   1.824


  8 in total

1.  An online forum as a qualitative research method: practical issues.

Authors:  Eun-Ok Im; Wonshik Chee
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel.

Authors:  Honghu Liu; David Cella; Richard Gershon; Jie Shen; Leo S Morales; William Riley; Ron D Hays
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations: Methodological Considerations for Online Focus Group Discussions.

Authors:  Sari L Reisner; Renee K Randazzo; Jaclyn M White Hughto; Sarah Peitzmeier; L Zachary DuBois; Dana J Pardee; Elliot Marrow; Sarah McLean; Jennifer Potter
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2017-05-04

4.  Challenges of using the internet for behavioral research.

Authors:  Lois J Loescher; Elizabeth Hibler; Heather Hiscox; Htay Hla; Robin B Harris
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.985

5.  Participant dropout as a function of survey length in internet-mediated university studies: implications for study design and voluntary participation in psychological research.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw       Date:  2010-05-11

6.  The Use of the Internet to Meet Sexual Partners: A Comparison of Non-Heterosexually-Identified Men with Heterosexually-Identified Men and Women.

Authors:  David Wyatt Seal; Eric G Benotsch; Marisa Green; Daniel J Snipes; Sheana S Bull; Anna Cejka; Shannon Perschbacher Lance; Christopher D Nettles
Journal:  Int J Sex Health       Date:  2015

7.  Binary choice health state valuation and mode of administration: head-to-head comparison of online and CAPI.

Authors:  Brendan Mulhern; Louise Longworth; John Brazier; Donna Rowen; Nick Bansback; Nancy Devlin; Aki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.725

8.  Comparison of Web-based and paper-based administration of ADHD questionnaires for adults.

Authors:  Oliver Hirsch; Franziska Hauschild; Martin H Schmidt; Erika Baum; Hanna Christiansen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.