Literature DB >> 14671988

Development of a job-specific FCE protocol: the work demands of hospital nurses as an example.

Monique H Frings-Dresen1, Judith K Sluiter.   

Abstract

Musculoskeletal disorders often result in employee disability leaves and sickness-related absenteeism in the workplace. Professional evaluations of an employee's capacity to work require additional support by means of Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) methods. However, most FCE methods assess general physical capacity and, because of fixed test procedures, testing times range between 4 and 6 h for up to several days. For return to work (vocational rehabilitation), the tests need to reflect the employees' specific work demands more precisely. This study aims to develop a job-specific FCE protocol on the Ergos Work Simulator for hospital nurses. In developing the contents of this specific protocol, hierarchical task analyses were performed with 20 nurses in four departments of a university medical center. A job-specific test protocol was developed that consisted of five steps. In this process, the original test protocol was analyzed first. Secondly, categorization of physical risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders revealed 16 possible combinations of activity, posture, and load. Finally, duration and frequencies during one working day of these combinations were coupled to the Ergos test panels. The nurse-specific test protocol lasts 90 min. It was possible to develop a job-specific protocol, using on-site observations as the input. Compared to the original Ergos protocol, the external validity of the new job-specific protocol has improved: it simulates the functional capacity that nurses need to perform their job in a realistic way. The testing time of the original Ergos protocol is four times longer compared to the new job-specific protocol.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14671988     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026268620904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  16 in total

1.  Group-based measurement strategies in exposure assessment explored by bootstrapping.

Authors:  M J Hoozemans; A Burdorf; A J van der Beek; M H Frings-Dresen; S E Mathiassen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.024

2.  Functional capacity evaluation: Ecological validity of three static endurance tests.

Authors:  M.F. Reneman; C.I. Joling; E.L. Soer; L.N.H. Göeken
Journal:  Work       Date:  2001

Review 3.  The functional capacity evaluation: measuring maximal work abilities.

Authors:  A K Tramposh
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar

4.  Problems in determining rest allowances Part 1: use of modern methods to evaluate stress and strain in static muscular work.

Authors:  W Rohmert
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Measuring residual functional capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; E Abdel-Moty; R Cutler; T M Khalil; S Sadek; R S Rosomoff; H L Rosomoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Validity of the dictionary of occupational titles residual functional capacity battery.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; R B Cutler; H Rosomoff; T Khalil; E Abdel-Moty; R Steele-Rosomoff
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 7.  Reactivity and recovery from different types of work measured by catecholamines and cortisol: a systematic literature overview.

Authors:  J K Sluiter; M H Frings-Dresen; T F Meijman; A J van der Beek
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Natural history of low back pain. A longitudinal study in nurses.

Authors:  J Smedley; H Inskip; C Cooper; D Coggon
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Concurrent validity of the ERGOS work simulator versus conventional functional capacity evaluation techniques in a workers' compensation population.

Authors:  L A Dusik; M R Menard; C Cooke; S M Fairburn; G N Beach
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1993-08

10.  The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  M F Reneman; S M H J Jaegers; M Westmaas; L N H Göeken
Journal:  Work       Date:  2002
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Patrick G Dempsey
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

2.  Matching FCE activities and work demands: an explorative study.

Authors:  W Kuijer; S Brouwer; M F Reneman; P U Dijkstra; J W Groothoff; J M H Schellekens; J H B Geertzen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

Review 3.  Measuring return to work.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Amanda E Young; Richard T Roessler; Kathryn M McPherson; Mireille N M van Poppel; Johannes R Anema
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-10-11

4.  Complementary value of functional capacity evaluation for physicians in assessing the physical work ability of workers with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Validity of the dictionary of occupational titles for assessing upper extremity work demands.

Authors:  Lonneke Opsteegh; Remko Soer; Heleen A Reinders-Messelink; Michiel F Reneman; Corry K van der Sluis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A trial of a job-specific workers' health surveillance program for construction workers: study protocol.

Authors:  Julitta S Boschman; Henk F van der Molen; Cor van Duivenbooden; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  The evolving role of physiotherapists in pre-employment screening for workplace injury prevention: are functional capacity evaluations the answer?

Authors:  Jennifer Legge
Journal:  Phys Ther Rev       Date:  2013-10

Review 8.  Workplace Outcomes in Work-Disability Prevention Research: A Review with Recommendations for Future Research.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; Eira Viikari-Juntura; Cécile R L Boot; Chetwyn Chan; David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2016-12

9.  A new pre-employment functional capacity evaluation predicts longer-term risk of musculoskeletal injury in healthy workers: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Legge; Robin Burgess-Limerick; Geeske Peeters
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.