Literature DB >> 14670414

Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Yoshiaki Nawa1, Tetsuo Ueda, Mieko Nakatsuka, Hideyuki Tsuji, Hiroshi Marutani, Yoshiaki Hara, Hiroshi Uozato.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the amount of accommodation per 1.0 mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens (IOL).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Nara Medical University, Nara, Japan.
METHODS: A ray-focusing equation of pseudophakic eyes was obtained with the ray-tracing method using Mathematica((R)) computer software (Wolfram). At first, it was assumed that the anterior radius of curvature of the cornea was 7.7 mm, the thickness was 0.5 mm, and the refractive index was 1.3375, and an AcrySof IOL (Alcon) was implanted in the capsular bag. Anterior and posterior radii of curvature and IOL thickness data were provided from the manufacturer and inserted in the equation. Next, the amount of accommodation per 1.0 mm of forward movement of a posterior chamber IOL was calculated under the assumption that the axial length (AL) varied from 21.0 to 27.0 mm and the implanted IOL from 30.0 to 11.0 diopters (D). The AL was fixed at 24.0 mm, and the anterior radius of curvature was varied from 6.5 to 9.5 mm and the IOL from 10.0 to 30.0 D. Similar calculations were then performed.
RESULTS: Under the assumption of a fixed corneal anterior radius of curvature of 7.7 mm, when the AL was 24.0 mm and the implanted IOL 20.0 D, 1.0 mm of forward IOL movement corresponded to 1.3 D of accommodation. When the AL was 21.0 mm and a the IOL 30.0 D, 1.0 mm of forward IOL movement corresponded to 2.3 D of accommodation. When the AL was 27.0 mm and the IOL 11.0 D, 1.0 mm of forward IOL movement corresponded to 0.8 D of accommodation. Similarly, when the anterior radius of corneal curvature was varied from 6.5 to 9.5 mm and the IOL from 10.0 to 30.0 D and the AL was fixed at 24.0 mm, 1.0 mm of forward IOL movement corresponded to 0.5 to 1.9 D of accommodation.
CONCLUSIONS: Accommodation obtained per 1.0 mm of forward IOL movement varied with AL from 0.8 D in a long eye to 2.3 D in a short eye. It also varied with the corneal power. Thus, one should not state that 1.0 mm of forward IOL movement always corresponds to a certain amount of diopters of accommodation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14670414     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(03)00257-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  15 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Position-dependent accommodative shift of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses.

Authors:  K Schöpfer; A Berger; C Korb; B M Stoffelns; N Pfeiffer; W Sekundo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens.

Authors:  G Sauder; R F Degenring; B Kamppeter; P Hugger
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Capsular bag refilling using a new accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Okihiro Nishi; Kayo Nishi; Yutaro Nishi; Shiao Chang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 5.  [Accommodation and presbyopia : part 2: surgical procedures for the correction of presbyopia].

Authors:  M Baumeister; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 6.  Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Human eye ocular component analysis for refractive state and refractive surgery.

Authors:  Chao-Kai Chang; Jui-Teng Lin; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 8.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Evaluation of the performance of accommodating IOLs using a paraxial optics analysis.

Authors:  Jit Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Pseudo-accommodation in non-amblyopic children after bilateral cataract surgery and implantation with a monofocal intraocular lens: prevalence and possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Charlotte Dénier; Pascal Dureau; Catherine Edelson; Amandine Barjol; Georges Caputo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.