BACKGROUND: The necessity of a 12-h fast before resting metabolic rate (RMR) is measured is often a barrier to measuring RMR. OBJECTIVE: We compared RMR measurements obtained in the morning and afternoon and across repeated days to elucidate the magnitude and sources of variability. DESIGN: Healthy men (n = 12) and women (n = 25) aged 21-67 y, with body mass indexes (in kg/m(2)) ranging from 17 to 34 and body fat ranging from 6% to 54%, completed 4 RMR measurements. RMR measurements were made in the morning (after a 12-h fast and 12 h postexercise) and in the afternoon (after a 4-h fast and 12 h postexercise) on 2 separate days with the ventilated-hood technique. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SE) afternoon RMR was significantly higher than morning RMR on both visit 1 (1593.5 +/- 35.6 compared with 1508.0 +/- 31.5 kcal/d; P = 0.001) and visit 2 (1602 +/- 29.3 compared with 1511.4 +/- 35.9 kcal/d; P = 0.001). The 2 morning measurements (r = 0.93) and the 2 afternoon measurements (r = 0.93) were highly correlated, and no significant differences between measurements were observed. The mean difference between the morning and afternoon measurements was 99.0 +/- 35.8 kcal/d (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated morning and evening measurements of RMR were stable and highly correlated. Day-to-day measurements of RMR were not significantly different. RMR measured in the afternoon after a 4-h fast and exercise was approximately 100 kcal/d higher than RMR measured in the morning.
BACKGROUND: The necessity of a 12-h fast before resting metabolic rate (RMR) is measured is often a barrier to measuring RMR. OBJECTIVE: We compared RMR measurements obtained in the morning and afternoon and across repeated days to elucidate the magnitude and sources of variability. DESIGN: Healthy men (n = 12) and women (n = 25) aged 21-67 y, with body mass indexes (in kg/m(2)) ranging from 17 to 34 and body fat ranging from 6% to 54%, completed 4 RMR measurements. RMR measurements were made in the morning (after a 12-h fast and 12 h postexercise) and in the afternoon (after a 4-h fast and 12 h postexercise) on 2 separate days with the ventilated-hood technique. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SE) afternoon RMR was significantly higher than morning RMR on both visit 1 (1593.5 +/- 35.6 compared with 1508.0 +/- 31.5 kcal/d; P = 0.001) and visit 2 (1602 +/- 29.3 compared with 1511.4 +/- 35.9 kcal/d; P = 0.001). The 2 morning measurements (r = 0.93) and the 2 afternoon measurements (r = 0.93) were highly correlated, and no significant differences between measurements were observed. The mean difference between the morning and afternoon measurements was 99.0 +/- 35.8 kcal/d (6%). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated morning and evening measurements of RMR were stable and highly correlated. Day-to-day measurements of RMR were not significantly different. RMR measured in the afternoon after a 4-h fast and exercise was approximately 100 kcal/d higher than RMR measured in the morning.
Authors: Joey C Eisenmann; Eric E Wickel; Scott A Kelly; Kevin M Middleton; Theodore Garland Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2009-04-19 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly; Bryan K Smith; Debra K Sullivan; Janet Marquis; Stephen D Herrmann Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Theresa Hagedorn; Eleonora Poggiogalle; Claudia Savina; Cecilia Coletti; Maddalena Paolini; Luciano Scavone; Barbara Neri; Lorenzo Maria Donini Journal: World J Exp Med Date: 2012-06-20
Authors: Victoria A Catenacci; Zhaoxing Pan; Danielle Ostendorf; Sarah Brannon; Wendolyn S Gozansky; Mark P Mattson; Bronwen Martin; Paul S MacLean; Edward L Melanson; William Troy Donahoo Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Laura A Olejnik; Emily N Peters; J Scott Parrott; Andrea F Marcus; Rebecca A Brody; Rosa K Hand; Justin J Fiutem; Laura D Byham-Gray Journal: JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Luigi Schiavo; Giuseppe Scalera; Vincenzo Pilone; Gabriele De Sena; Vincenzo Quagliariello; Antonio Iannelli; Alfonso Barbarisi Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 4.129