Literature DB >> 14667696

Knowledge, expectations, and inductive reasoning within conceptual hierarchies.

John D Coley1, Brett Hayes, Christopher Lawson, Michelle Moloney.   

Abstract

Previous research (e.g. Cognition 64 (1997) 73) suggests that the privileged level for inductive inference in a folk biological conceptual hierarchy does not correspond to the "basic" level (i.e. the level at which concepts are both informative and distinct). To further explore inductive inference within conceptual hierarchies, we examine relations between knowledge of concepts at different hierarchical levels, expectations about conceptual coherence, and inductive inference. In Experiments 1 and 2, 5- and 8-year-olds and adults listed features of living kind (Experiments 1 and 2) and artifact (Experiment 2) concepts at different hierarchical levels (e.g. plant, tree, oak, desert oak), and also rated the strength of generalizations to the same concepts. For living kinds, the level that showed a relative advantage on these two tasks differed; the greatest increase in features listed tended to occur at the life-form level (e.g. tree), whereas the greatest increase in inductive strength tended to occur at the folk-generic level (e.g. oak). Knowledge and induction also showed different developmental trajectories. For artifact concepts, the levels at which the greatest gains in knowledge and induction occurred were more varied, and corresponded more closely across tasks. In Experiment 3, adults reported beliefs about within-category similarity for concepts at different levels of animal, plant and artifact hierarchies, and rated inductive strength as before. For living kind concepts, expectations about category coherence predicted patterns of inductions; knowledge did not. For artifact concepts, both knowledge and expectations predicted patterns of induction. Results suggest that beliefs about conceptual coherence play an important role in guiding inductive inference, that this role may be largely independent of specific knowledge of concepts, and that such beliefs are especially important in reasoning about living kinds.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14667696     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00159-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  6 in total

Review 1.  Domains and naïve theories.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Nicholaus S Noles
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-17

2.  Inductive selectivity in children's cross-classified concepts.

Authors:  Simone P Nguyen
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2012-07-16

3.  How to carry out conceptual properties norming studies as parameter estimation studies: Lessons from ecology.

Authors:  Enrique Canessa; Sergio E Chaigneau; Rodrigo Lagos; Felipe A Medina
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-02

4.  FN400 amplitudes reveal the differentiation of semantic inferences within natural vs. artificial domains.

Authors:  Changquan Long; Mingming Zhang; Ruifang Cui; Jie Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  P3a amplitude is related to conclusion specificity during category-based induction.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Ruifang Cui; Changquan Long
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Categories convey prescriptive information across domains and development.

Authors:  Emily Foster-Hanson; Steven O Roberts; Susan A Gelman; Marjorie Rhodes
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2021-08-03
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.