Literature DB >> 14667470

A comparison of in vitro toxicities of cigarette smoke condensate from Eclipse cigarettes and four commercially available ultra low-"tar" cigarettes.

J W D Foy1, B R Bombick, D W Bombick, D J Doolittle, A T Mosberg, J E Swauger.   

Abstract

Eclipse is a cigarette that primarily heats rather than burns tobacco. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company (RJRT) has previously reported the results of in vitro toxicity studies comparing Eclipse with University of Kentucky 1R5F and 1R4F reference cigarettes. To characterize the differences between Eclipse and very low yielding/ultra low-"tar" (vULT) tobacco-burning cigarettes, RJRT conducted a comparative evaluation of the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of mainstream cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) from Eclipse and three vULT tobacco-burning cigarettes (Now 83 Box, Merit Ultima and Carlton Soft Pack) as well as the leading ultra low-"tar" (ULT) brandstyle (Marlboro Ultra Lights) under four smoking regimens: (1) FTC-35 ml puff volume every 60 s for a 2 s duration (35/60/2); (2) 50/30/2, 0% vents blocked; (3) Massachusetts-45/30/2, 50% vents blocked; (4) Canadian-55/30/2, 100% vents blocked. Ames testing indicated that Eclipse CSC was less (P<0.05) mutagenic than CSC from the four cigarettes under all smoking regimens when compared on a revertants per mg Total Particulate Matter (TPM) basis. When mutagenicity was calculated on a revertants per cigarette basis the mutagenicity of Eclipse CSC was lower (P<0.05) than the mutagenicity of Merit Ultima, Carlton Soft Pack, and Marlboro Ultra Lights, regardless of the puffing regimen. On a per cigarette basis, the calculated mutagenicity of Eclipse was higher (P<0.05) than Now 83 Box cigarettes in the FTC and 50/30/2 regimens but lower (P<0.05) in the Massachusetts and Canadian regimens. Eclipse CSC was less (P<0.05) cytotoxic as measured in the neutral red assay (based on EC(50) values-microg TPM/ml media) than the CSC from the four test cigarettes regardless of the regimen used. Collectively, these data demonstrate that the toxicity of CSC from Eclipse is significantly reduced relative to the activity of CSC from the tested vULT cigarettes and the Marlboro Ultra Lights.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14667470     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2003.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  9 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of in vitro assays for assessing the toxicity of cigarette smoke and smokeless tobacco.

Authors:  Michael D Johnson; Jodi Schilz; Mirjana V Djordjevic; Jerry R Rice; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Concentration dependent effects of tobacco particulates from different types of cigarettes on expression of drug metabolizing proteins, and benzo(a)pyrene metabolism in primary normal human oral epithelial cells.

Authors:  Peter G Sacks; Zhong-Lin Zhao; Wieslawa Kosinska; Kenneth E Fleisher; Terry Gordon; Joseph B Guttenplan
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 6.023

3.  Cigarette smoke and adverse health effects: An overview of research trends and future needs.

Authors:  Sibu P Saha; Deepak K Bhalla; Thomas F Whayne; Cg Gairola
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2007

4.  Toxicological analysis of low-nicotine and nicotine-free cigarettes.

Authors:  Jinguo Chen; Richard Higby; Defa Tian; Duanjun Tan; Michael D Johnson; Yingxian Xiao; Kenneth J Kellar; Shibao Feng; Peter G Shields
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Genetic toxicology and toxicogenomic analysis of three cigarette smoke condensates in vitro reveals few differences among full-flavor, blonde, and light products.

Authors:  Carole L Yauk; Andrew Williams; Julie K Buick; Guosheng Chen; Rebecca M Maertens; Sabina Halappanavar; Paul A White
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 6.  Smoking and reproduction: the oviduct as a target of cigarette smoke.

Authors:  Prue Talbot; Karen Riveles
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 5.211

7.  Development, qualification, validation and application of the Ames test using a VITROCELL® VC10® smoke exposure system.

Authors:  Kathy Fowler; Wanda Fields; Victoria Hargreaves; Lesley Reeve; Betsy Bombick
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2018-04-12

8.  In vitro mutagenicity of gas-vapour phase extracts from flavoured and unflavoured heated tobacco products.

Authors:  Theo Le Godec; Ian Crooks; Ken Scott; Clive Meredith
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2019-10-07

9.  Chronic E-Cigarette Exposure Alters the Human Bronchial Epithelial Proteome.

Authors:  Arunava Ghosh; Raymond C Coakley; Teresa Mascenik; Temperance R Rowell; Eric S Davis; Keith Rogers; Megan J Webster; Hong Dang; Laura E Herring; M Flori Sassano; Alessandra Livraghi-Butrico; Scott K Van Buren; Lee M Graves; Melissa A Herman; Scott H Randell; Neil E Alexis; Robert Tarran
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 30.528

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.