Literature DB >> 14666833

Information mastery: integrating continuing medical education with the information needs of clinicians.

Mark H Ebell1, Allen Shaughnessy.   

Abstract

Traditional continuing medical education (CME) has been disconnected from the actual practice of medicine and has not focused on providing the most useful information in the most efficient way. Physicians have different information needs at different times. When asked at the end of a day of patient care, physicians will typically report having had one question for every four or five patients. However, direct observation during patient care reveals many more questions. In the outpatient primary care setting, most studies have found, on average, that about two clinical questions are generated during every three patient encounters, with even higher numbers reported in the inpatient teaching setting. Thus, a physician seeing 25 patients in a typical day of outpatient care may have 15 clinical questions. Because clinical questions are the result of critical reflection by a clinician on his or her practice, they are central, to physician learning. This connection between "need" and learning is consistent with generally accepted theories of adult learning. When applied to continuing education, this connection suggests that physicians will learn best when learning is in the context of patient care, answers their questions, does not take too much time, and is directly applicable to their work. Pursuing answers to these questions and answering them with the best available evidence, at the time the answer is needed, may well change the physician's general approach to patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14666833     DOI: 10.1002/chp.1340230409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof        ISSN: 0894-1912            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

1.  A centralized practice-based learning and improvement curriculum for residents and fellows: a collaboration of health sciences librarians and graduate medical education administration.

Authors:  Doreen R Bradley; Gurpreet K Rana; Monica L Lypson; Stanley J Hamstra
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2010-04

Review 2.  Keeping up: learning in the workplace.

Authors:  Jeremy C Wyatt; Frank Sullivan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-11-12

3.  The San Antonio CATs Initiative.

Authors:  John D Rugh; William D Hendricson; John P Hatch; Birgit J Glass
Journal:  J Am Coll Dent       Date:  2010

4.  Should we be teaching information management instead of evidence-based medicine?

Authors:  Shepard R Hurwitz; David C Slawson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers.

Authors:  Rita Banzi; Alessandro Liberati; Ivan Moschetti; Ludovica Tagliabue; Lorenzo Moja
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  A training intervention to improve information management in primary care.

Authors:  Karen E Schifferdecker; Virginia A Reed; Karen Homa
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  A blended knowledge translation initiative to improve colorectal cancer staging [ISRCTN56824239].

Authors:  Frances C Wright; Calvin H L Law; Linda D Last; Neil Klar; David P Ryan; Andrew J Smith
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-01-16       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 8.  Point of care information services: a platform for self-directed continuing medical education for front line decision makers.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moja; Koren Hyogene Kwag
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Adapting a large database of point of care summarized guidelines: a process description.

Authors:  Nicolas Delvaux; Stijn Van de Velde; Bert Aertgeerts; Martine Goossens; Benjamin Fauquert; Ilka Kunnamo; Paul Van Royen
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.431

10.  The propensity to adopt evidence-based practice among physical therapists.

Authors:  Patricia H Bridges; Laura L Bierema; Thomas Valentine
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.