Literature DB >> 14665872

Clinical usefulness of serum antip53 antibodies for prostate cancer detection: a comparative study with prostate specific antigen parameters.

Hiroyoshi Suzuki1, Koichiro Akakura, Tatsuo Igarashi, Takeshi Ueda, Haruo Ito, Masatoshi Watanabe, Fumio Nomura, Takenori Ochiai, Hidekii Shimada.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Alterations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene located on human chromosome 17p13.1 are currently the most common genetic abnormalities associated with many different types of human malignancies. Recently serum p53 antibodies (p53-Abs) have been detected in the serum of patients with various cancers. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of serum p53-Abs we compared p53-Abs with prostate specific antigen (PSA) parameters in patients with benign prostatic disease (BPD) and prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 50 patients with BPD and 103 with histologically diagnosed prostate cancer, including T1c/2N0M0 in 50, T3N0M0 in 29 and TxNxM1 in 24. The serum p53-Abs titer was assessed by enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay using a MESCUP Kit II (Medical and Biological Laboratories Co., Ltd., Nagoya, Japan) antip53 test. Free and total PSA was measured using an Architect (Dinabott, Chicago, Illinois) PSA kit. The clinical values of p53-Abs were compared with total PSA, PSA density (PSAD), PSA density of the transition zone (PSATZD) and the free-to-total PSA ratio using ROC curves.
RESULTS: All patients with prostate cancer had significantly higher total PSA, PSAD, PSATZD and p53-Abs than patients with BPD. While total PSA, PSAD, PSATZD and free-to-total PSA ratios were associated with stage progression, serum p53-Abs were not related to clinical stage. The Gleason sum 5 or less group had a higher level of p53-Abs than higher Gleason sum groups. Patients with T1c cancer had significantly higher p53-Abs than those with BPD. According to ROC curve analysis to distinguish prostate cancer from BPD the p53-Abs titer had the greatest AUC in the overall patient population and in patients without digital rectal examination findings.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that p53-Abs might be helpful in the clinical decision to perform prostate biopsy. In the current study the serum p53-Abs titer had the most useful validity in discriminating between prostate cancer and BPD in the overall patient population and in patients with normal digital rectal examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665872     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000101501.54931.4a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Autoantibody biomarkers identified by proteomics methods distinguish ovarian cancer from non-ovarian cancer with various CA-125 levels.

Authors:  Aykan A Karabudak; Julie Hafner; Vivekananda Shetty; Songming Chen; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Michael A Morse; Ramila Philip
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.553

2.  Autoantibody against hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase-3 is a potential serological marker for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Toshiaki Tanaka; Hiroshi Kitamura; Toshihiko Torigoe; Yoshihiko Hirohashi; Eiji Sato; Naoya Masumori; Noriyuki Sato; Taiji Tsukamoto
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Image-based clinical decision support for transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of multiple logistic regression, artificial neural network, and support vector machine.

Authors:  Hak Jong Lee; Sung Il Hwang; Seok-Min Han; Seong Ho Park; Seung Hyup Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho; Chang Gyu Seong; Gheeyoung Choe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  p53 antibodies in the serum of patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yoko Kubota; Yoshiki Onmura; Hiroshi Ohji; Takuya Kunii; Tomohiro Shibasaki; Teruhiro Nakada; Yoshihiko Tomita
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Shared immunoproteome for ovarian cancer diagnostics and immunotherapy: potential theranostic approach to cancer.

Authors:  Ramila Philip; Sidhartha Murthy; Jonathan Krakover; Gomathinayagam Sinnathamby; Jennifer Zerfass; Lorraine Keller; Mohan Philip
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 6.  Molecular and pathological signatures of epithelial-mesenchymal transitions at the cancer invasion front.

Authors:  Olivier De Wever; Patrick Pauwels; Bram De Craene; Michèle Sabbah; Shahin Emami; Gérard Redeuilh; Christian Gespach; Marc Bracke; Geert Berx
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 4.304

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.