Literature DB >> 14665835

An evaluation of the decreasing incidence of positive surgical margins in a large retropubic prostatectomy series.

Misop Han1, Alan W Partin, David Y Chan, Patrick C Walsh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Positive surgical margins adversely affect biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer. We retrospectively reviewed a large series of men who underwent RRP at a single academic university urology program to define the change in the incidence of organ confined (OC) disease and positive surgical margin (SM+) during the last 2 decades.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1982 and 2001, 9,035 men underwent RRP for clinically localized prostate cancer (T1 to T3a) at a single institution. We compared the incidences of OC disease and SM+ in this population.
RESULTS: An increasing proportion of men presented with OC disease over time. The incidence of SM+ in the overall RRP population decreased dramatically over time. However, in men with nonorgan confined disease (pT3), the proportion with SM+ was stable and consistently elevated (22.7% to 27.8%), after the initial decrease from the early 1980s (53%).
CONCLUSIONS: Widespread early detection programs for prostate cancer resulted in a downward stage migration in men presenting with clinically localized prostate cancer at our institution during the last 2 decades. The decrease in the percentage of men with SM+ was due to the increasing number of men with organ confined disease. These results imply that the decrease in surgical margin rates in the overall RRP population is most likely due to stage migration and improved patient selection, rather than major improvements in surgical technique. The stable percentage of SM+ among men with pT3 disease dictates the need for continued evaluation of surgical technique and the need for effective adjuvant therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14665835     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000098604.09395.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted prostatectomy: the new standard of care.

Authors:  Gencay Hatiboglu; Dogu Teber; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy: Genito-Urinary Radiation Oncologists of Canada Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Tom Pickles; Scott Morgan; Gerard Morton; Louis Souhami; Padraig Warde; Himu Lukka
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Impact of surgical technique (open vs laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted) on pathological and biochemical outcomes following radical prostatectomy: an analysis using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Mark L Gonzalgo; Li-Ming Su; Thomas J Guzzo; George Netto; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Misop Han; Alan W Partin; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Prostate cancer: seminal vesicle sparing: a continuing trend?

Authors:  Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  [Oncological and functional results of open intrafascial radical prostatectomy].

Authors:  W Y Khoder; A Buchner; S Siegert; C G Stief; B Schlenker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Impact of a multidisciplinary continuous quality improvement program on the positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Karim Touijer; Kentaro Kuroiwa; Andrew Vickers; Victor E Reuter; Hedwig Hricak; Peter T Scardino; Bertrand Guillonneau
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Updated nomogram to predict pathologic stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen level, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score (Partin tables) based on cases from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Danil V Makarov; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Patrick C Walsh; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Is the transition from open to robotic prostatectomy fair to your patients? A single-surgeon comparison with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Robert B Nadler; Jessica T Casey; Lee C Zhao; Neema Navai; Zachary L Smith; Ali Zhumkhawala; Amanda M Macejko
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2009-11-19

9.  Novel diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Chikezie O Madu; Yi Lu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy: Population-based averages within PSA and Gleason strata.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Marco A Salazar; Suman Chatterjee; Daniel W Lin; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.