Literature DB >> 14664782

Factors impacting questionnaire response in a Dutch retrospective cohort study.

Cécile Ronckers1, Charles Land, Richard Hayes, Peter Verduijn, Flora van Leeuwen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study questionnaire length, type of consent, approach to recruitment, and subject characteristics on participation in epidemiologic studies.
METHODS: As part of a health survey among Dutch subjects treated for ear, nose, and throat disorders in childhood, we conducted a pilot study of 200 individuals who were randomly assigned to one of four categories, defined by length of questionnaire (long vs. short) and type of consent form (basic vs. multi-option). In addition, among 8402 subjects eligible to be in the main study (average age 41 years in 1997), we examined the effect of approach to recruitment and subject characteristics on participation rates.
RESULTS: The pilot study showed a non-significant 10% increase in participation rate using the shorter questionnaire, but no differences by type of consent form. In the full survey, the participation rate was 49% after the first mailing. Response increased by 15% after a written reminder and by 10% after a telephone survey. The total participation rate was 74%. Attained age, sex, exposure status, age at exposure, and response to an earlier survey were determinants of participation rates. Among male non-participants, outright refusal was less frequent than non-response. The refusal rate, unlike the non-response rate, was positively associated with older age at time of survey.
CONCLUSIONS: Health survey participation is influenced by questionnaire length, frequency of contact, and subject characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14664782     DOI: 10.1016/s1047-2797(03)00123-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  11 in total

1.  Prevalence, awareness, and management of CKD and cardiovascular risk factors in publicly funded health care.

Authors:  Jacobien C Verhave; Stéphan Troyanov; Frédéric Mongeau; Lorraine Fradette; Josée Bouchard; Philip Awadalla; François Madore
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Ian Zajac; Tess Gregory; Sarah Mehaffey; Naomi Roosa; Deborah Turnbull; Adrian Esterman; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2011-12

3.  Shortening a survey and using alternative forms of prenotification: impact on response rate and quality.

Authors:  Timothy J Beebe; Enrique Rey; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah Jenkins; Kandace Lackore; Nicholas J Talley; Richard G Locke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Asthma is not enough: continuation of smoking among parents with an asthmatic child.

Authors:  Joel J Liem; Anita L Kozyrskyj; Cecilia M Benoit; Allan B Becker
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.409

Review 5.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.

Authors:  Philip James Edwards; Ian Roberts; Mike J Clarke; Carolyn Diguiseppi; Reinhard Wentz; Irene Kwan; Rachel Cooper; Lambert M Felix; Sarah Pratap
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

6.  Sense of coherence and attrition during four-year follow-up in cohorts of permanent and non-permanent Finnish employees.

Authors:  Virpi Liukkonen; Pekka Virtanen; Mika Kivimäki; Jaana Pentti; Jussi Vahtera
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Program design features that can improve participation in health education interventions.

Authors:  Enza Gucciardi; Jill I Cameron; Chen Di Liao; Alison Palmer; Donna E Stewart
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  The impact of non-responders on health and lifestyle outcomes in an intervention study.

Authors:  Elsebeth Hansen; Kirsten Fonager; Kirsten S Freund; Jørgen Lous
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-09-11

9.  Written informed consent for participation in a study and reduction in consent rate.

Authors:  Akiko Tamakoshi; Takashi Kawamura; Kenji Wakai; Masahiko Ando
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adel Elfeky; Katie Gillies; Heidi Gardner; Cynthia Fraser; Timothy Ishaku; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.