Literature DB >> 14663089

The distribution and genetic structure of Escherichia coli in Australian vertebrates: host and geographic effects.

David M Gordon1, Ann Cowling.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli was isolated from more than 2300 non-domesticated vertebrate hosts living in Australia. E. coli was most prevalent in mammals, less prevalent in birds and uncommon in fish, frogs and reptiles. Mammals were unlikely to harbour E. coli if they lived in regions with a desert climate and less likely to have E. coli if they lived in the tropics than if they lived in semi-arid or temperate regions. In mammals, the likelihood of isolating E. coli from an individual depended on the diet of the host and E. coli was less prevalent in carnivores than in herbivores or omnivores. In both birds and mammals, the probability of isolating E. coli increased with the body mass of the host. Hosts living in close proximity to human habitation were more likely to harbour E. coli than hosts living away from people. The relative abundance of E. coli groups A, B1, B2 and D strains in mammals depended on climate, host diet and body mass. Group A strains were uncommon, but were isolated from both ectothermic and endothermic vertebrates. Group B1 strains could also be isolated from any vertebrate group, but were predominant in ectothermic vertebrates, birds and carnivorous mammals. Group B2 strains were unlikely to be isolated from ectotherms and were most abundant in omnivorous and herbivorous mammals. Group D strains were rare in ectotherms and uncommon in endotherms, but were equally abundant in birds and mammals. The results of this study suggest that, at the species level, the ecological niche of E. coli is mammals with hindgut modifications to enable microbial fermentation, or in the absence of a modified hindgut, E. coli can only establish a population in 'large-bodied' hosts. The non-random distribution of E. coli genotypes among the different host groups indicates that strains of the four E. coli groups may differ in their ecological niches and life-history characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14663089     DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.26486-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  100 in total

1.  Ecological adaptation in bacteria: speciation driven by codon selection.

Authors:  Adam C Retchless; Jeffrey G Lawrence
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Comparative prevalence of Escherichia coli carrying virulence genes and class 1 and 2 integrons in sub-tropical and cool temperate freshwater.

Authors:  Jatinder P S Sidhu; Paul Jagals; Amy Smith; Simon Toze
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Towards a conceptual and operational union of bacterial systematics, ecology, and evolution.

Authors:  Frederick M Cohan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evolution of microcin V and colicin Ia plasmids in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Anne Jeziorowski; David M Gordon
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Feeding the probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain NCIMB 10415 to piglets specifically reduces the number of Escherichia coli pathotypes that adhere to the gut mucosa.

Authors:  Carmen Bednorz; Sebastian Guenther; Kathrin Oelgeschläger; Bianca Kinnemann; Robert Pieper; Susanne Hartmann; Karsten Tedin; Torsten Semmler; Konrad Neumann; Peter Schierack; Astrid Bethe; Lothar H Wieler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Genetic Structure and Antimicrobial Resistance of Escherichia coli and Cryptic Clades in Birds with Diverse Human Associations.

Authors:  Michaela D J Blyton; Hongfei Pi; Belinda Vangchhia; Sam Abraham; Darren J Trott; James R Johnson; David M Gordon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Substructure within Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolates from Australian wildlife.

Authors:  Sandra K Parsons; C Michael Bull; David M Gordon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Escherichia coli isolate for studying colonization of the mouse intestine and its application to two-component signaling knockouts.

Authors:  Melissa Lasaro; Zhi Liu; Rima Bishar; Kathryn Kelly; Sujay Chattopadhyay; Sandip Paul; Evgeni Sokurenko; Jun Zhu; Mark Goulian
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Zoonotic potential of Escherichia coli isolates from retail chicken meat products and eggs.

Authors:  Natalie M Mitchell; James R Johnson; Brian Johnston; Roy Curtiss; Melha Mellata
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Escherichia coli phylogenetic group determination and its application in the identification of the major animal source of fecal contamination.

Authors:  Camila Carlos; Mathias M Pires; Nancy C Stoppe; Elayse M Hachich; Maria I Z Sato; Tânia A T Gomes; Luiz A Amaral; Laura M M Ottoboni
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.