Literature DB >> 14662210

Prevalence of estrogen or estrogen-progestin hormone therapy use.

Kate M Brett1, Cynthia A Reuben.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To use nationally representative data to produce prevalence estimates of combination estrogen-progestin therapy and estrogen-only therapy by covariates, and to evaluate differences between current use of short duration (less than 5 years) and current long-term use.
METHODS: We analyzed data from female respondents 40 years of age and older (n = 9400) who were interviewed in the 1999 National Health Interview Survey. Hormone therapy use was categorized into four types: current estrogen-progestin therapy use, current estrogen-only therapy use, former hormone therapy use, and never use. We calculated the prevalence of hormone therapy by different levels of previously identified covariates of hormone therapy, as well as overall prevalence of hormone therapy use by length of use.
RESULTS: Approximately 24% of women aged 40 years or older were current hormone users. Of these, 30% were taking estrogen-progestin therapy, and 70% were taking estrogen-only therapy. The prevalence of hormone use differed dramatically by hysterectomy status and age, and less so by many demographic, health-risk behavior, medical access, and medical history variables. Among women with no hysterectomy, the associations with many of the covariates were stronger for estrogen-progestin therapy use than for estrogen-only therapy use. Only 3% of women were estimated to be current estrogen-progestin therapy users for 5 or more years, whereas 10% were current estrogen-only therapy users for 5 or more years.
CONCLUSION: Although many women at midlife and older were current hormone users, very few were long-term users of estrogen-progestin therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14662210     DOI: 10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Self-reported changes in providers' hormone therapy prescribing and counseling practices after the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Susan L Lakey; Susan D Reed; Andrea Z LaCroix; Lou Grothaus; Katherine M Newton
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Hormone use and lung cancer incidence: the Rancho Bernardo cohort study.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Donna Kritz-Silverstein; Deborah L Wingard; Wael K Al-Delaimy
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Provider attributes associated with hormone therapy prescribing frequency.

Authors:  Leslie Spangler; Susan D Reed; Larissa Nekhyludov; Louis C Grothaus; Andrea Z LaCroix; Katherine M Newton
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  A sustained decline in postmenopausal hormone use: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2010.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Chronic exposures to low levels of estradiol and their effects on the ovaries and reproductive hormones: Comparison with aging.

Authors:  Ebony T Gilbreath; Sheba M J MohanKumar; Priya Balasubramanian; Dalen W Agnew; P S MohanKumar
Journal:  Endocr Disruptors (Austin)       Date:  2014-12-17

6.  Are endocrine disrupting compounds a health risk in drinking water?

Authors:  Ian R Falconer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  HT update: spotlight on estradiol/norethindrone acetate combination therapy.

Authors:  Colleen L Casey; Christine A Murray
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.458

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.