Literature DB >> 14662044

Novel doublets in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II study of topotecan plus cisplatin or paclitaxel (CALGB 9430).

Alan P Lyss1, James E Herndon, Thomas J Lynch, Andrew T Turrisi, Dorothy M Watson, Sara J Grethlein, Mark R Green.   

Abstract

Chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (E-SCLC) produces high response rates and improved survival but few cures. We tested three new regimens for E-SCLC that might merit further investigation in a subsequent phase III trial. Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9430 was a randomized phase II study evaluating 4 treatment arms in 57 evaluable, previously untreated E-SCLC patients. Each arm consisted of the following: Arm 1: cisplatin plus topotecan; Arm 2: cisplatin plus paclitaxel; Arm 3: paclitaxel 230 mg/m2 plus topotecan; and Arm 4: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus topotecan. Because of an accrual time difference, Arm 2 will not be discussed in this manuscript. Arm 1 (12 patients) produced 1 complete response (CR, 8%) and an overall response rate (ORR) of 42%. Toxicity was excessive, with 3 deaths (25%). Arm 3 (13 patients) produced no CRs, 7 partial responses (PRs, 54%), median survival of 13.8 months, and failure-free survival (FFS) of 7.41 months, with 3 toxic deaths (25%). Among 32 evaluable patients on Arm 4, there were 2 CRs (6%) and 20 PRs (63%) for an ORR of 69%, median survival of 9.9 months, FFS of 5.21 months, and 1-year survival of 40%. There was 1 possible treatment-related death (3%). Topotecan plus cisplatin, in the doses and schedule employed, produced excessive toxicity and modest efficacy in E-SCLC patients. Paclitaxel (230 mg/m2 on day 1) plus topotecan (1 mg/m2 on days 1-5) produced excessive toxicity that was ameliorated with an attenuated paclitaxel dose (175 mg/m2). With the latter regimen (Arm 4) in patients with a performance status of 0/1, CR rates, FFS, overall survival, and 1-year survival were similar to standard etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy. Further exploration of topoisomerase inhibitors and taxanes in SCLC patients is warranted.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 14662044     DOI: 10.3816/clc.2002.n.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer        ISSN: 1525-7304            Impact factor:   4.785


  6 in total

Review 1.  Initial management of small-cell lung cancer (limited- and extensive-stage) and the role of thoracic radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Sun; L D Durocher-Allen; P M Ellis; Y C Ung; J R Goffin; K Ramchandar; G Darling
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  E5501: phase II study of topotecan sequenced with etoposide/cisplatin, and irinotecan/cisplatin sequenced with etoposide for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Taofeek K Owonikoko; Joseph Aisner; Xin Victoria Wang; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Eric H Rubin; Suresh S Ramalingam; Murugesan Gounder; Paul Gregory Rausch; Rita S Axelrod; Joan H Schiller
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  Phase II trial of oral topotecan and intravenous carboplatin with G-CSF support in previously untreated patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study.

Authors:  Alan H Bryce; Bassam Mattar; Shauna L Hillman; Alex A Adjei; John W Kugler; Kendrith Rowland; Donald B Wender; Gamini Soori; Edith A Perez; James R Jett
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 4.  Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Isuru U Amarasena; Saion Chatterjee; Julia A E Walters; Richard Wood-Baker; Kwun M Fong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-02

5.  Phase II trial of paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9430.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe; Ann M Mauer; Lydia D Hodgson; James E Herndon; Thomas J Lynch; Mark R Green; Everett E Vokes
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 15.609

6.  Patient education level as a predictor of survival in lung cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  James E Herndon; Alice B Kornblith; Jimmie C Holland; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 44.544

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.