Radioimmunotherapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with 90Y-DOTA humanized anti-CD22 IgG (90Y-Epratuzumab): do tumor targeting and dosimetry predict therapeutic response?

UNLABELLED: A DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N",N"'-tetraacetic acid)-conjugated, (111)In- and (90)Y-labeled humanized antibody to CD22, epratuzumab, was studied in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) to assess biodistribution and tumor targeting, pharmacokinetics, dosimetry, and anti-antibody response. Of particular interest was to evaluate whether pretherapy targeting and tumor dosimetry could predict therapeutic responses.
METHODS: Patients received a pretherapy imaging study with (111)In-DOTA-epratuzumab IgG (0.75 mg/kg), followed about 1 wk later with (90)Y-DOTA-epratuzumab starting at a dose level of 0.185 GBq/m(2) (5 mCi/m(2)) in patients who had prior high-dose chemotherapy (group 2), and at 0.370 GBq/m(2) in patients who did not have a prior transplant (group 1), with escalation in 0.185-GBq/m(2) increments.
RESULTS: The effective blood half-life for (111)In-DOTA epratuzumab was 36.1 +/- 7.9 h (n = 25) compared with 35.2 +/- 7.0 h for (90)Y-DOTA-epratuzumab (n = 22). The whole-body half-life for (90)Y-DOTA-epratuzumab estimated from (111)In-DOTA-epratuzumab scintigraphy was 58.3 +/- 4.7 h (n = 20), with urine collection confirming the loss of between 2.2% and 15.9% of the injected activity over 3 d (n = 3). One-hundred sixteen of 165 CT-confirmed lesions were visualized with (111)In-DOTA-epratuzumab. Radiation-absorbed doses to liver, lungs, and kidneys averaged 0.55 +/- 0.13 (n = 17), 0.28 +/- 0.06 (n = 17), and 0.38 +/- 0.07 mGy/MBq (n = 10), respectively, with 0.14 +/- 0.02 and 0.23 +/- 0.04 mGy/MBq delivered to the whole-body and red marrow, respectively. Tumor doses (n = 14 lesions in 10 patients) ranged from 1.0 to as much as 83 mGy/MBq for a 0.5-g lesion (median, 7.15 mGy/MBq). Group 2 patients were more likely to experience significant hematologic toxicities, but doses of up to 0.370 GBq/m(2) of (90)Y-DOTA-epratuzumab were tolerated with standard support measures, whereas patients in group 1 tolerated doses of up to 0.740 GBq/m(2) with the potential for further escalation. Anti-tumor effects were seen in both indolent and aggressive NHL. The data also suggest that anti-tumor responses of potentially equal magnitude can occur irrespective of tumor targeting and tumor size. Hence, tumor response did not correlate with the radiation dose delivered or with the tumor being visualized by external imaging. An anti-antibody response to epratuzumab was detected by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in only 2 of 16 patients.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that (90)Y-DOTA-epratuzmab is a promising agent for the treatment of NHL and warrants further study. There was evidence suggesting that in this system, factors other than tumor radiation dose and targeting may be involved in the success of radioimmunotherapy.