Literature DB >> 14660509

Influence of body composition on physical activity validation studies using doubly labeled water.

Louise C Mâsse1, Janet E Fulton, Kathleen L Watson, Matthew T Mahar, Michael C Meyers, William W Wong.   

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of two approaches (mathematical transformation and statistical procedures), used to account for body composition [body mass or fat-free mass (FFM)], on associations between two measures of physical activity and energy expenditure determined by doubly labeled water (DLW). Complete data for these analyses were available for 136 African American (44.1%) and Hispanic (55.9%) women (mean age 50 +/- 7.3 yr). Total energy expenditure (TEE) by DLW was measured over 14 days. Physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) was computed as 0.90 x TEE - resting metabolic rate. During week 2, participants wore an accelerometer for 7 consecutive days and completed a 7-day diary. Pearson's product-moment correlations and three statistical procedures (multiple regressions, partial correlations, and allometric scaling) were used to assess the effect of body composition on associations. The methods-comparison analysis was used to study the effect of body composition on agreement. The statistical procedures demonstrated that associations improved when body composition was included in the model. The accelerometer explained a small but meaningful portion of the variance in TEE and PAEE after body mass was accounted for. The methods-comparison analysis confirmed that agreement with DLW was affected by the transformation. Agreement between the diary (transformed with body mass) and TEE reflected the association that exists between body mass and TEE. These results suggest that the accelerometer and diary accounted for a small portion of TEE and PAEE. Most of the variance in DLW-measured energy expenditure was explained by body mass or FFM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14660509     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00901.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  23 in total

1.  Physical activity assessment: biomarkers and self-report of activity-related energy expenditure in the WHI.

Authors:  Marian L Neuhouser; Chongzhi Di; Lesley F Tinker; Cynthia Thomson; Barbara Sternfeld; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Marcia L Stefanick; Stacy Sims; J David Curb; Michael Lamonte; Rebecca Seguin; Karen C Johnson; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The Sedentary Time and Activity Reporting Questionnaire (STAR-Q): reliability and validity against doubly labeled water and 7-day activity diaries.

Authors:  Ilona Csizmadi; Heather K Neilson; Karen A Kopciuk; Farah Khandwala; Andrew Liu; Christine M Friedenreich; Yutaka Yasui; Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret; Heather E Bryant; David C W Lau; Paula J Robson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  The doubly labeled water method produces highly reproducible longitudinal results in nutrition studies.

Authors:  William W Wong; Susan B Roberts; Susan B Racette; Sai Krupa Das; Leanne M Redman; James Rochon; Manjushri V Bhapkar; Lucinda L Clarke; William E Kraus
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 4.  Prediction of activity-related energy expenditure using accelerometer-derived physical activity under free-living conditions: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Jeran; A Steinbrecher; T Pischon
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Self-administered physical activity questionnaires for the elderly: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Lisa Forsén; Nina Waaler Loland; Anne Vuillemin; Mai J M Chinapaw; Mireille N M van Poppel; Lidwine B Mokkink; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Comparative validity of physical activity measures in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa H Colbert; Charles E Matthews; Thomas C Havighurst; Kyungmann Kim; Dale A Schoeller
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Energy expenditure in adults living in developing compared with industrialized countries: a meta-analysis of doubly labeled water studies.

Authors:  Lara R Dugas; Regina Harders; Sarah Merrill; Kara Ebersole; David A Shoham; Elaine C Rush; Felix K Assah; Terrence Forrester; Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu; Amy Luke
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 7.045

8.  Evaluation of the wrist-worn ActiGraph wGT3x-BT for estimating activity energy expenditure in preschool children.

Authors:  C Delisle Nyström; J Pomeroy; P Henriksson; E Forsum; F B Ortega; R Maddison; J H Migueles; M Löf
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Accelerometer profiles of physical activity and inactivity in normal weight, overweight, and obese U.S. men and women.

Authors:  Catrine Tudor-Locke; Meghan M Brashear; William D Johnson; Peter T Katzmarzyk
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 10.  Energy expenditure and aging.

Authors:  Todd M Manini
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 10.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.