Literature DB >> 14659923

Cervical spine curvature during simulated whiplash.

Manohar M Panjabi1, Adam M Pearson, Shigeki Ito, Paul C Ivancic, Jaw-Lin Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new method to describe cervical spine curvature and evaluate the potential for injury in the upper and lower cervical spine during simulated whiplash.
DESIGN: A method was developed to integrate the upper and lower cervical spine rotations and describe the spine curvature.
BACKGROUND: In vivo and in vitro whiplash simulations have documented the development of an S-shape curvature with simultaneous upper cervical spine flexion and lower cervical spine extension immediately following rear-impact. Investigators have hypothesized that the injury potential is highest during the S-shape phase. However, little data exist on the spine curvature during whiplash and its relation to spine injury.
METHODS: A biofidelic model and a bench-top whiplash apparatus were used in an incremental rear-impact protocol (maximum 8 g) to simulate whiplash of increasing severity. To describe the spine curvature, the upper and lower cervical spine rotations were normalized to corresponding physiological limits.
RESULTS: Average peak lower cervical spine extension first exceeded the physiological limits (P<0.05) at a horizontal T1 acceleration of 5 g. Average peak upper cervical spine extension exceeded the physiological limit at 8 g, while peak upper cervical spine flexion never exceeded the physiological limit. In the S-shape phase, lower cervical spine extension reached 84% of peak extension during whiplash.
CONCLUSIONS: Both the upper and lower cervical spine are at risk for extension injury during rear-impact. Flexion injury is unlikely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14659923     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  10 in total

1.  Spinal canal narrowing during simulated frontal impact.

Authors:  Paul C Ivancic; Manohar M Panjabi; Yasuhiro Tominaga; Adam M Pearson; S Elena Gimenez; Travis G Maak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Activating transcription factor 4, a mediator of the integrated stress response, is increased in the dorsal root ganglia following painful facet joint distraction.

Authors:  L Dong; B B Guarino; K L Jordan-Sciutto; B A Winkelstein
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Passive cervical spine ligaments provide stability during head impacts.

Authors:  Calvin Kuo; Jodie Sheffels; Michael Fanton; Ina Bianca Yu; Rosa Hamalainen; David Camarillo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Come on baby, let's do the twist: the kinematics of killing in loggerhead shrikes.

Authors:  Diego Sustaita; Margaret A Rubega; Susan M Farabaugh
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  [Problems involved in expert opinions on acceleration injuries of the cervical spine].

Authors:  W Wyrwich; C E Heyde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  The role of tissue damage in whiplash-associated disorders: discussion paper 1.

Authors:  Michele Curatolo; Nikolai Bogduk; Paul C Ivancic; Samuel A McLean; Gunter P Siegmund; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Advancements in Imaging Technology: Do They (or Will They) Equate to Advancements in Our Knowledge of Recovery in Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Charles Hazle; Mark A Hoggarth; Jacob McPherson; Cheryl L Sparks; Kenneth A Weber
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Minimizing the source of nociception and its concurrent effect on sensory hypersensitivity: an exploratory study in chronic whiplash patients.

Authors:  Geoff M Schneider; Ashley D Smith; Allen Hooper; Paul Stratford; Kathryn J Schneider; Michael D Westaway; Bevan Frizzell; Lee Olson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Cervical Spine Injuries: A Whole-Body Musculoskeletal Model for the Analysis of Spinal Loading.

Authors:  Dario Cazzola; Timothy P Holsgrove; Ezio Preatoni; Harinderjit S Gill; Grant Trewartha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Signal intensity loss of the intervertebral discs in the cervical spine of young patients on fluid sensitive sequences.

Authors:  F de Bruin; S Ter Horst; R van den Berg; M de Hooge; F van Gaalen; K M Fagerli; R Landewé; M van Oosterhout; J L Bloem; D van der Heijde; M Reijnierse
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 2.199

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.