Literature DB >> 14657145

Lactobacillus kitasatonis sp. nov., from chicken intestine.

Takao Mukai1, Keizo Arihara, Ami Ikeda, Kazuhito Nomura, Fumihiko Suzuki, Hitoshi Ohori.   

Abstract

Four strains isolated from chicken small intestine and strains JCM 1038 and JCM 1039 (designated as Lactobacillus acidophilus) were characterized by phenotypic and molecular taxonomic methods. They were Gram-positive, catalase-negative, facultatively anaerobic rods that did not produce gas from glucose. These strains had similar phenotypic characteristics and exhibited intergroup DNA relatedness values of >77 %, indicating that they comprised a single species. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of a representative strain, JCM 1039(T) (designated as type strain in this study), was determined and aligned with those of other Lactobacillus species. JCM 1039(T) was placed in the Lactobacillus delbrueckii cluster of the genus Lactobacillus on the basis of phylogenetic analysis and formed an independent cluster that was distinct from its closest neighbours, Lactobacillus amylovorus, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus gallinarum, L. acidophilus and Lactobacillus helveticus. Results of DNA-DNA hybridization experiments and whole-cell protein profiles clearly indicated that these strains represent a novel Lactobacillus species, for which the name Lactobacillus kitasatonis sp. nov. is proposed; the type strain of this species is JCM 1039(T).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14657145     DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02815-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


  8 in total

1.  Lactobacillus and Pediococcus species richness and relative abundance in the vagina of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Michael G Gravett; Ling Jin; Sylvia I Pavlova; Lin Tao
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 0.667

2.  Draft genome sequence of Lactobacillus gigeriorum CRBIP 24.85T, isolated from a chicken crop.

Authors:  Sylvie Cousin; Laurence Ma; Sophie Creno; Dominique Clermont; Valentin Loux; Chantal Bizet; Christiane Bouchier
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Representational difference analysis and real-time PCR for strain-specific quantification of Lactobacillus sobrius sp. nov.

Authors:  Sergey R Konstantinov; Hauke Smidt; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Specific response of a novel and abundant Lactobacillus amylovorus-like phylotype to dietary prebiotics in the guts of weaning piglets.

Authors:  Sergey R Konstantinov; Ajay Awati; Hauke Smidt; Barbara A Williams; Antoon D L Akkermans; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Distribution of megaplasmids in Lactobacillus salivarius and other lactobacilli.

Authors:  Yin Li; Carlos Canchaya; Fang Fang; Emma Raftis; Kieran A Ryan; Jan-Peter van Pijkeren; Douwe van Sinderen; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Comparison of intestinal permeability, morphology, and ileal microbial communities of commercial hens housed in conventional cages and cage-free housing systems.

Authors:  Maddison L Wiersema; Lucas R Koester; Stephan Schmitz-Esser; Dawn A Koltes
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Dual Inhibition of Salmonella enterica and Clostridium perfringens by New Probiotic Candidates Isolated from Chicken Intestinal Mucosa.

Authors:  Ayesha Lone; Walid Mottawea; Yasmina Ait Chait; Riadh Hammami
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-01-13

8.  Characterizing Peri-Implant and Sub-Gingival Microbiota through Culturomics. First Isolation of Some Species in the Oral Cavity. A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Leonardo Martellacci; Gianluca Quaranta; Giovanni Fancello; Antonio D'Addona; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Romeo Patini; Luca Masucci
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-05-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.