Literature DB >> 14655990

Reducing exposure to laboratory animal allergens.

Isabelle B Schweitzer1, Ellen Smith, David J Harrison, David D Myers, Peyton A Eggleston, Jason D Stockwell, Beverly Paigen, Abigail L Smith.   

Abstract

Laboratory animal allergy is a serious health problem. We examined several possible allergen-reducing strategies that might be effective in the working mouse room. Ambient allergen concentrations were measured when mice were maintained under several conditions: conventional housing versus ventilated cage racks operated under negative or positive pressure. We found that housing mice in ventilated cages operated under negative pressure and using ventilated changing tables reduced ambient mouse allergen (Mus m 1) concentrations tenfold, compared with values when mice were housed in conventional caging and using a conventional (non-ventilated) changing table. Housing mice in positively pressurized cages versus conventional cages did not reduce ambient allergen values. Cleaning mouse rooms at an accelerated frequency also did not reduce ambient Mus m 1 concentration. We also quantified ambient allergen values in several areas of The Jackson Laboratory. A facility-wide survey of Mus m 1 concentrations indicated that allergen concentrations were undetectable in control areas, but ranged from a mean (+/- SEM) 0.11 +/- 0.02 ng/m3 to 5.40 +/- 0.30 ng/m3 in mouse rooms with different cage types. The percentage of animal caretakers reporting allergy symptoms correlated significantly with ambient allergen concentrations: 12.9% reported symptoms in the rooms with the lowest allergen concentration (0.14 +/- 0.02 ng/m3), but 45.9% reported symptoms in rooms with the highest concentration (2.3 +/- 0.4 ng/m3). These data indicate that existing technology can significantly reduce exposure to laboratory animal allergens and improve the health of animal caretakers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14655990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  9 in total

1.  Bedding-generated particulate matter: implications for rodent studies.

Authors:  Neelakshi Hudda; John L Durant; Alexandra Nemeth; Phyllis Mann; Jocelyn Petitto; Douglas Brugge; Benjamin C Nephew
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Is there a need for special preventive medical check-ups in employees exposed to experimental animal dust?

Authors:  Klaus Schmid; Barbara Jüngert; Meta Hager; Hans Drexler
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  A risk-based approach to reducing exposure of staff to laboratory animal allergens.

Authors:  Lynda Westall; Ian R Graham; James Bussell
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 12.625

4.  Effect of Room Ventilation Rates in Rodent Rooms with Direct-Exhaust IVC Systems.

Authors:  Roger S Geertsema; Claire E Lindsell
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Evaluation of Various IVC Systems According to Mouse Reproductive Performance and Husbandry and Environmental Parameters.

Authors:  Mitchel G Stover; Jason S Villano
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 1.706

6.  Exposure of laboratory animal care workers to airborne mouse and rat allergens.

Authors:  Joshua T Glueck; Richard B Huneke; Hernando Perez; Igor Burstyn
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Influence of 5 different caging types and the use of cage-changing stations on mouse allergen exposure.

Authors:  Susan Feistenauer; Ingrid Sander; Jörg Schmidt; Eva Zahradnik; Monika Raulf; Markus Brielmeier
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 8.  Recommended housing densities for research mice: filling the gap in data-driven alternatives.

Authors:  Karen L Svenson; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.834

9.  Laboratory animals and respiratory allergies: the prevalence of allergies among laboratory animal workers and the need for prophylaxis.

Authors:  Erica Ferraz; Luisa Karla de Paula Arruda; Ericson Bagatin; Edson Z Martinez; Andrea A Cetlin; Christian S Simoneti; Amanda S Freitas; José A B Martinez; Marcos C Borges; Elcio O Vianna
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.365

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.