Literature DB >> 14655934

Independent verification of ultrasound based image-guided radiation treatment, using electronic portal imaging and implanted gold markers.

Frank Van den Heuvel1, Tanya Powell, Edward Seppi, Peter Littrupp, Mubashra Khan, Yue Wang, Jeffrey D Forman.   

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study the correction of prostate motion and position during external beam therapy. The correction was performed using a commercially available ultrasound-based repositioning tool. Electronic portal imaging with the use of fiducial markers was used to assess efficacy and accuracy. Patients undergoing radiation treatment for adenocarcinoma of the prostate were enrolled in a positioning study. Fifteen patients had five to six gold fiducial markers implanted in their prostate. These patients were positioned daily in a standard manner and then were repositioned every other day using an ultrasound-based correction system. Every fraction of a patients' treatment was imaged. This yielded 156 image pairs with and 119 pairs without repositioning available for analysis. This group of patients with markers had the following residual positions measured after the use of ultrasound repositioning. A mean error of -0.4 mm (LL), -2.6 mm (CC), and +2.5 mm (AP) with a standard deviation of 4.3, 5.4, and 5.7 mm. In two directions the improvements of treatment using the ultrasound correction were smaller than the precision of this experiment. They were no larger than 0.81 mm (LAT), and 0.95 mm (CC). In the AP direction a significant improvement was found of 1.6 mm. A highly significant correlation (p < 0.001) was found between the residual errors in the cranio-caudal direction and the shifts performed on the basis of the ultrasound measurements (Spearman ranking R = 0.53). We presented a method to objectively estimate improvements by a correction scheme. This method applied to ultrasound-based adjustment showed significant improvement in one direction and no measurable improvement in two other directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14655934     DOI: 10.1118/1.1617354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  An analysis of an implantable dosimeter system for external beam therapy.

Authors:  Robert D Black; Charles W Scarantino; Gregory G Mann; Mitchell S Anscher; Robert D Ornitz; Benjamin E Nelms
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Intrafractional motion of the prostate during hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yaoqin Xie; David Djajaputra; Christopher R King; Sabbir Hossain; Lijun Ma; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Evaluation of the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical variations on prostate proton therapy using daily in-room CT images.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Jason A Efstathiou; Gregory C Sharp; Hsiao-Ming Lu; I Frank Ciernik; Alexei V Trofimov
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A strategy for the use of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) on linear accelerators and its impact on treatment margins for prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Olaf Nairz; Florian Merz; Heinz Deutschmann; Peter Kopp; Helmut Schöller; Franz Zehentmayr; Karl Wurstbauer; Gerhard Kametriser; Felix Sedlmayer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Tomotherapy as a tool in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): theoretical and technological aspects.

Authors:  S Yartsev; T Kron; J Van Dyk
Journal:  Biomed Imaging Interv J       Date:  2007-01-01

Review 6.  Imaging in radiation oncology: a perspective.

Authors:  Laura A Dawson; Cynthia Ménard
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010

Review 7.  Ultrasound Imaging in Radiation Therapy: From Interfractional to Intrafractional Guidance.

Authors:  Craig Western; Dimitre Hristov; Jeffrey Schlosser
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-06-20

8.  Comparison of transabdominal ultrasound and electromagnetic transponders for prostate localization.

Authors:  Ryan D Foster; Timothy D Solberg; Haisen S Li; Andrew Kerkhoff; Charles A Enke; Twyla R Willoughby; Patrick A Kupelian
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Target localization for post-prostatectomy patients using CT and ultrasound image guidance.

Authors:  Kamen Paskalev; Steven Feigenberg; Rojymon Jacob; Shawn McNeeley; Eric Horwitz; Robert Price; Charlie Ma; Alan Pollack
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Comparison of prostate verification with implanted gold markers in tissue surrounding the prostate and pelvic bony anatomy for external beam radiation therapy following low-dose-rate brachytherapy: a prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Tomoya Kaneda; Toshio Ohashi; Takashi Hanada; Koji Takenaka; Shuichi Nishimura; Masanori Sakayori; Shinya Sutani; Tetsuo Momma; Naoyuki Shigematsu
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 2.724

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.