Literature DB >> 14652481

Outcome determinants of subacute low back pain.

Kaija Karjalainen1, Antti Malmivaara, Pertti Mutanen, Timo Pohjolainen, Risto Roine, Heikki Hurri.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Descriptive prognostic study.
OBJECTIVES: To identify outcome determinants of subacute low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The factors predicting recovery from prolonged back pain among working adults are largely unknown.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-four employed patients with subacute (duration of pain 4-12 weeks) daily low back pain were recruited from primary health care to a randomized study. Data on potential predictive factors were collected before randomization. In multiple regressions using repeated measures analysis, the treatment received was adjusted when determining the impact of the predictive factors. Dependent outcome variables used were pain, perceived functional disability, generic health-related quality of life, satisfaction with care, days on sick leave, use of health care, and costs of health care consumption measured, at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups.
RESULTS: Age and intensity of pain at baseline predicted most of the outcomes. The perceived risk of not recovering was a stronger determinant of outcome than gender, education, or self-rated health status (which did not have any predictive value) or body mass index, expectations of treatment effect, satisfaction with work, or the presence of radicular symptoms below the knee (only slight predictive value). The only factors predicting the duration of sick leave were the duration of sick leave at baseline and the type of occupation.
CONCLUSION: Age and intensity of pain are the strongest predictors of outcome. Accumulation of days on sick leave is predicted by the duration of sick leave at entry and the type of work, but not by pain, perceived disability, or satisfaction with work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652481     DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000099097.61495.2E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Does expecting mean achieving? The association between expecting to return to work and recovery in whiplash associated disorders: a population-based prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Dejan Ozegovic; Linda J Carroll; J David Cassidy
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Prediction of sickness absence in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wietske Kuijer; Johan W Groothoff; Sandra Brouwer; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

4.  [Measures of success in treatment of chronic back pain: pain intensity, disability and functional capacity: determinants of treatment success in multimodal day clinic setting].

Authors:  M Heinrich; K Hafenbrack; C Michel; D Monstadt; U Marnitz; R Klinger
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Absenteeism screening questionnaire (ASQ): a new tool for predicting long-term absenteeism among workers with low back pain.

Authors:  Manon Truchon; Marie-Ève Schmouth; Denis Côté; Lise Fillion; Michel Rossignol; Marie-José Durand
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

6.  Low back pain.

Authors:  Anthony Delitto; Steven Z George; Linda Van Dillen; Julie M Whitman; Gwendolyn Sowa; Paul Shekelle; Thomas R Denninger; Joseph J Godges
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Low back pain: what determines functional outcome at six months? An observational study.

Authors:  Michele C Harms; Charles E Peers; Derek Chase
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 8.  Measures of patients' expectations about recovery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Shanil Ebrahim; Cindy Malachowski; Mostafa Kamal El Din; Sohail M Mulla; Luis Montoya; Sheena Bance; Jason W Busse
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-03

9.  Value of predictive instruments to determine persisting restriction of function in patients with subacute non-specific low back pain. Systematic review.

Authors:  Roger Hilfiker; Lucas M Bachmann; Carolin A-M Heitz; Tobias Lorenz; Harri Joronen; Andreas Klipstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Systematic review of the ability of recovery expectations to predict outcomes in non-chronic non-specific low back pain.

Authors:  Ross A Iles; Megan Davidson; Nicholas F Taylor; Paul O'Halloran
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.