AIMS: Verbal autopsy (VA) has become an important tool in the past 20 years for determining cause of death in communities where there is no routine registration. In many cases, expert physicians have been used to interpret the VA findings and so assign individual causes of death. However, this is time consuming and not always repeatable. Other approaches such as algorithms and neural networks have been developed in some settings. This paper aims to develop a method that is simple, reliable and consistent, which could represent an advance in VA interpretation. METHODS: This paper describes the development of a Bayesian probability model for VA interpretation as an attempt to find a better approach. This methodology and a preliminary implementation are described, with an evaluation based on VA material from rural Vietnam. RESULTS: The new model was tested against a series of 189 VA interviews from a rural community in Vietnam. Using this very basic model, over 70% of individual causes of death corresponded with those determined by two physicians increasing to over 80% if those cases ascribed to old age or as being indeterminate by the physicians were excluded. DISCUSSION: Although there is a clear need to improve the preliminary model and to test more extensively with larger and more varied datasets, these preliminary results suggest that there may be good potential in this probabilistic approach.
AIMS: Verbal autopsy (VA) has become an important tool in the past 20 years for determining cause of death in communities where there is no routine registration. In many cases, expert physicians have been used to interpret the VA findings and so assign individual causes of death. However, this is time consuming and not always repeatable. Other approaches such as algorithms and neural networks have been developed in some settings. This paper aims to develop a method that is simple, reliable and consistent, which could represent an advance in VA interpretation. METHODS: This paper describes the development of a Bayesian probability model for VA interpretation as an attempt to find a better approach. This methodology and a preliminary implementation are described, with an evaluation based on VA material from rural Vietnam. RESULTS: The new model was tested against a series of 189 VA interviews from a rural community in Vietnam. Using this very basic model, over 70% of individual causes of death corresponded with those determined by two physicians increasing to over 80% if those cases ascribed to old age or as being indeterminate by the physicians were excluded. DISCUSSION: Although there is a clear need to improve the preliminary model and to test more extensively with larger and more varied datasets, these preliminary results suggest that there may be good potential in this probabilistic approach.
Authors: Maurice Yé; Eric Diboulo; Louis Niamba; Ali Sié; Boubacar Coulibaly; Cheik Bagagnan; Jonas Dembélé; Heribert Ramroth Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2011-08-04
Authors: Christopher Jl Murray; Spencer L James; Jeanette K Birnbaum; Michael K Freeman; Rafael Lozano; Alan D Lopez Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2011-08-04
Authors: Rafael Lozano; Alan D Lopez; Charles Atkinson; Mohsen Naghavi; Abraham D Flaxman; Christopher Jl Murray Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2011-08-04
Authors: Shaun K Morris; Diego G Bassani; Rajesh Kumar; Shally Awasthi; Vinod K Paul; Prabhat Jha Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Warangkana Polprasert; Chalapati Rao; Timothy Adair; Junya Pattaraarchachai; Yawarat Porapakkham; Alan D Lopez Journal: Popul Health Metr Date: 2010-05-18