Literature DB >> 14648658

In lymph node-negative invasive breast carcinomas, specific chromosomal aberrations are strongly associated with high mitotic activity and predict outcome more accurately than grade, tumour diameter, and oestrogen receptor.

Emiel A M Janssen1, Jan P A Baak, Marta Alonso Guervós, Paul J van Diest, M Jiwa, Mario A J A Hermsen.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to analyse whether specific chromosomal gains and losses in lymph node-negative breast cancer correlate with other features and to evaluate their prognostic value. Seventy-six lymph node-negative breast carcinomas (median follow-up 46 months; range 9-105 months) were used. Histological grade, tumour type, maximal tumour diameter, oestrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR), mitotic activity index (MAI), and mean nuclear area (MNA) were assessed. Whole genome DNA analysis was performed by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Chromosomal aberrations were compared with classical and other prognostic features. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate survival analysis (Cox model) were used to assess the prognostic value of the CGH and other data. Fifteen (21.4%) out of 70 patients (six cases were lost to follow-up) developed locoregional (n=3) or distant metastases (n=12). The following criteria were prognostic for (any) recurrence (in decreasing significance): 3q gain, simultaneous gain at 1q and 8q, MAI < versus > or =10, MNA < versus > or =63 microm. Loss of 1p occurred significantly more often in the large group of ductal breast carcinomas with a MAI > or =10 (n=38) than in cancers with a MAI<10. Moreover, 8/15 (53%) patients with recurrences had a gain at 3q, as opposed to three (5.5%) of the 55 recurrence-free patients. This association was even stronger in ductal carcinomas (hazard ratio=10.9, p<0.0001). Cox regression revealed that the 3q gain was the strongest prognostic factor; other features did not have additional prognostic value. In conclusion, loss of 1p is associated with a high MAI. A gain of 3q is a stronger predictor of recurrence than grade, MAI, and other features in invasive breast cancers. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648658     DOI: 10.1002/path.1475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  9 in total

1.  Metastatic properties and genomic amplification of the tyrosine kinase gene ACK1.

Authors:  Edward Htun van der Horst; Yan Y Degenhardt; Astrid Strelow; Anthony Slavin; Lawrence Chinn; Jessica Orf; Minqing Rong; Shyun Li; Lei-Hoon See; Ken Q C Nguyen; Timothy Hoey; Holger Wesche; Scott Powers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  8p deletion is strongly linked to poor prognosis in breast cancer.

Authors:  P Lebok; A Mittenzwei; M Kluth; C Özden; B Taskin; K Hussein; K Möller; A Hartmann; A Lebeau; I Witzel; S Mahner; L Wölber; F Jänicke; S Geist; P Paluchowski; C Wilke; U Heilenkötter; R Simon; G Sauter; L Terracciano; R Krech; A von der Assen; V Müller; E Burandt
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Chromosome 1q25.3 copy number alterations in primary breast cancers detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and allelic imbalance assays and its comparison with fluorescent in situ hybridization assays.

Authors:  Emilia Wiechec; Jens Overgaard; Eigil Kjeldsen; Lise Lotte Hansen
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 6.730

4.  Genomic signatures of breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  V Urquidi; S Goodison
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Expression of the embryonic stem cell marker SOX2 in early-stage breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Claudia Lengerke; Tanja Fehm; Ralf Kurth; Hans Neubauer; Veit Scheble; Friederike Müller; Friederike Schneider; Karen Petersen; Diethelm Wallwiener; Lothar Kanz; Falko Fend; Sven Perner; Petra M Bareiss; Annette Staebler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Sox2 promotes tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Marco Piva; Giacomo Domenici; Oihana Iriondo; Miriam Rábano; Bruno M Simões; Valentine Comaills; Inmaculada Barredo; Jose A López-Ruiz; Ignacio Zabalza; Robert Kypta; Maria d M Vivanco
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.137

7.  Stem cell-like transcriptional reprogramming mediates metastatic resistance to mTOR inhibition.

Authors:  F Mateo; E J Arenas; H Aguilar; J Serra-Musach; G Ruiz de Garibay; J Boni; M Maicas; S Du; F Iorio; C Herranz-Ors; A Islam; X Prado; A Llorente; A Petit; A Vidal; I Català; T Soler; G Venturas; A Rojo-Sebastian; H Serra; D Cuadras; I Blanco; J Lozano; F Canals; A M Sieuwerts; V de Weerd; M P Look; S Puertas; N García; A S Perkins; N Bonifaci; M Skowron; L Gómez-Baldó; V Hernández; A Martínez-Aranda; M Martínez-Iniesta; X Serrat; J Cerón; J Brunet; M P Barretina; M Gil; C Falo; A Fernández; I Morilla; S Pernas; M J Plà; X Andreu; M A Seguí; R Ballester; E Castellà; M Nellist; S Morales; J Valls; A Velasco; X Matias-Guiu; A Figueras; J V Sánchez-Mut; M Sánchez-Céspedes; A Cordero; J Gómez-Miragaya; L Palomero; A Gómez; T F Gajewski; E E W Cohen; M Jesiotr; L Bodnar; M Quintela-Fandino; N López-Bigas; R Valdés-Mas; X S Puente; F Viñals; O Casanovas; M Graupera; J Hernández-Losa; S Ramón Y Cajal; L García-Alonso; J Saez-Rodriguez; M Esteller; A Sierra; N Martín-Martín; A Matheu; A Carracedo; E González-Suárez; M Nanjundan; J Cortés; C Lázaro; M D Odero; J W M Martens; G Moreno-Bueno; M H Barcellos-Hoff; A Villanueva; R R Gomis; M A Pujana
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  Dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization reveals an association of chromosome 8q22 but not 8p21 imbalance with high grade invasive breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Logan C Walker; Margaret McDonald; J Elisabeth Wells; Gavin C Harris; Bridget A Robinson; Christine M Morris
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Analysis of the relationship between coexpression domains and chromatin 3D organization.

Authors:  María E Soler-Oliva; José A Guerrero-Martínez; Valentina Bachetti; José C Reyes
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.475

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.