Literature DB >> 14645469

Impact of photon noise on the reliability of a motion-sensitive neuron in the fly's visual system.

Jan Grewe1, Jutta Kretzberg, Anne-Kathrin Warzecha, Martin Egelhaaf.   

Abstract

Variable behavioral responses to identical visual stimuli can, in part, be traced back to variable neuronal signals that provide unreliable information about the outside world. This unreliability in encoding of visual information is caused by several noise sources such as photon noise, synaptic noise, or the stochastic nature of ion channels. Neurons of the fly's visual motion pathway have been claimed to represent perfect encoders, with photon noise as the main noise source limiting their performance. Other studies on the fly's visual system suggest, however, that internal noise emerging within the nervous system also affects the reliability of motion vision. To resolve these contradictory interpretations, we performed an electrophysiological investigation, inspired by the "equivalent noise" paradigm applied in psychophysics, on the fly's motion-sensitive H1 neuron. Noise-like brightness fluctuations of different strength were superimposed on the motion stimuli. Because the noise level found to affect the temporal properties of the spike responses is much larger than the estimate of photon noise under the experimental conditions, our results indicate that motion vision is more likely to be limited by internal sources of variability than by photon noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14645469      PMCID: PMC6740987     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  15 in total

1.  Fly motion vision is based on Reichardt detectors regardless of the signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  J Haag; W Denk; A Borst
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Spike train metrics.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Propagation of photon noise and information transfer in visual motion detection.

Authors:  Lei Shi; Alexander Borst
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  Evolutionarily conserved coding properties of auditory neurons across grasshopper species.

Authors:  Daniela Neuhofer; Sandra Wohlgemuth; Andreas Stumpner; Bernhard Ronacher
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Channel noise from both slow adaptation currents and fast currents is required to explain spike-response variability in a sensory neuron.

Authors:  Karin Fisch; Tilo Schwalger; Benjamin Lindner; Andreas V M Herz; Jan Benda
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Coding efficiency of fly motion processing is set by firing rate, not firing precision.

Authors:  Deusdedit Lineu Spavieri; Hubert Eichner; Alexander Borst
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  The natural variation of a neural code.

Authors:  Yoav Kfir; Ittai Renan; Elad Schneidman; Ronen Segev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relating neuronal to behavioral performance: variability of optomotor responses in the blowfly.

Authors:  Ronny Rosner; Anne-Kathrin Warzecha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Information and discriminability as measures of reliability of sensory coding.

Authors:  Jan Grewe; Matti Weckström; Martin Egelhaaf; Anne-Kathrin Warzecha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial vision in insects is facilitated by shaping the dynamics of visual input through behavioral action.

Authors:  Martin Egelhaaf; Norbert Boeddeker; Roland Kern; Rafael Kurtz; Jens P Lindemann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.