Literature DB >> 14642639

Electrical stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray decreases volume of the brain infarction independently of accompanying hypertension and cerebrovasodilation.

Sara B Glickstein1, Christopher P Ilch, Eugene V Golanov.   

Abstract

We investigated whether selective stimulation of neurons of the sympathoinhibitory ventral periaqueductal gray (VPAG), or sympathoexcitatory dorsal periaqueductal gray (DPAG), differentially modulates CBF and EEG and exerts neuroprotection. Electrical stimulation of either regions of PAG comparably elevated AP and CBF, whereas chemical stimulation with the D,L-homocysteine produced either sympathoinhibition accompanied by decrease in CBF from ventral region or sympathoexcitation accompanied by increase in CBF from dorsal region in nonspinalized rats. The CBF effects evoked from DPAG and VPAG by chemical stimulation were preserved in spinalized rats supporting that the evoked CBF responses result directly from stimulation and are not secondary to AP changes. Stimulation of either region, whether chemical or electrical, synchronized the EEG. To explore whether PAG stimulation might protect the brain against ischemic injury, in other rats the VPAG or DPAG were stimulated for 1 h (50 Hz, 1 s on/1 s off, 75-100 microA) and the middle cerebral artery occluded 72 h later. Stimulation of the DPAG, but not VPAG, significantly reduced infarction volumes relative to sham-stimulated controls as determined 24 h after occlusion. Elevations of AP and CBF did not differ between groups. We conclude: (a). intrinsic neurons of D- and VPAG differentially regulate CBF; (b). neurons of DPAG are neuroprotective independently of changes in CBF and/or AP. The DPAG effect on infarct volume may be related to the central neuroprotective pathway evoked by stimulation of the cerebellar FN.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14642639     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  6 in total

1.  Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation Ameliorates Acute Ischemic Injury in Rats.

Authors:  Ilknur Ay; Rena Nasser; Bruce Simon; Hakan Ay
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Central Nervous System Electrical Stimulation for Neuroprotection in Acute Cerebral Ischemia: Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies.

Authors:  Mersedeh Bahr Hosseini; Jesse Hou; Marom Bikson; Marco Iacoboni; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Ablation of the sphenopalatine ganglion does not attenuate the infarct reducing effect of vagus nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Ilknur Ay; Hakan Ay
Journal:  Auton Neurosci       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.145

4.  Neurogenic neuroprotection: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Mauricio Mandel; Erich Talamoni Fonoff; Edson Bor-Seng-Shu; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Gerson Chadi
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  Regulation of cerebral vasculature in normal and ischemic brain.

Authors:  Tobias Kulik; Yoshikazu Kusano; Shimon Aronhime; Adam L Sandler; H Richard Winn
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2008-04-26       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  Integrity of Cerebellar Fastigial Nucleus Intrinsic Neurons Is Critical for the Global Ischemic Preconditioning.

Authors:  Eugene V Golanov; Angelique S Regnier-Golanov; Gavin W Britz
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2017-09-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.