Literature DB >> 14642565

Altered translesion synthesis in E. coli Pol V mutants selected for increased recombination inhibition.

Suzanne Sommer1, Olivier J Becherel, Geneviève Coste, Adriana Bailone, Robert P P Fuchs.   

Abstract

Replication of damaged DNA, also termed as translesion synthesis (TLS), involves specialized DNA polymerases that bypass DNA lesions. In Escherichia coli, although TLS can involve one or a combination of DNA polymerases depending on the nature of the lesion, it generally requires the Pol V DNA polymerase (formed by two SOS proteins, UmuD' and UmuC) and the RecA protein. In addition to being an essential component of translesion DNA synthesis, Pol V is also an antagonist of RecA-mediated recombination. We have recently isolated umuD' and umuC mutants on the basis of their increased capacity to inhibit homologous recombination. Despite the capacity of these mutants to form a Pol V complex and to interact with the RecA polymer, most of them exhibit a defect in TLS. Here, we further characterize the TLS activity of these Pol V mutants in vivo by measuring the extent of error-free and mutagenic bypass at a single (6-4)TT lesion located in double stranded plasmid DNA. TLS is markedly decreased in most Pol V mutants that we analyzed (8/9) with the exception of one UmuC mutant (F287L) that exhibits wild-type bypass activity. Somewhat unexpectedly, Pol V mutants that are partially deficient in TLS are more severely affected in mutagenic bypass compared to error-free synthesis. The defect in bypass activity of the Pol V mutant polymerases is discussed in light of the location of the respective mutations in the 3D structure of UmuD' and the DinB/UmuC homologous protein Dpo4 of Sulfolobus solfataricus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14642565     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2003.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  5 in total

1.  Escherichia coli UmuC active site mutants: effects on translesion DNA synthesis, mutagenesis and cell survival.

Authors:  Wojciech Kuban; Alexandra Vaisman; John P McDonald; Kiyonobu Karata; Wei Yang; Myron F Goodman; Roger Woodgate
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-07-10

2.  Y-family DNA polymerases respond to DNA damage-independent inhibition of replication fork progression.

Authors:  Veronica G Godoy; Daniel F Jarosz; Fabianne L Walker; Lyle A Simmons; Graham C Walker
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Steric gate variants of UmuC confer UV hypersensitivity on Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Brenna W Shurtleff; Jaylene N Ollivierre; Mohammad Tehrani; Graham C Walker; Penny J Beuning
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  A RecA protein surface required for activation of DNA polymerase V.

Authors:  Angela J Gruber; Aysen L Erdem; Grzegorz Sabat; Kiyonobu Karata; Malgorzata M Jaszczur; Dan D Vo; Tayla M Olsen; Roger Woodgate; Myron F Goodman; Michael M Cox
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 5.  Targeting evolution of antibiotic resistance by SOS response inhibition.

Authors:  Alexander Yakimov; Irina Bakhlanova; Dmitry Baitin
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 7.271

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.