Literature DB >> 14642552

A randomized trial of telephone counseling to promote screening mammography in two HMOs.

Roger Luckmann1, Judith A Savageau, Lynn Clemow, Anne M Stoddard, Mary E Costanza.   

Abstract

Tailored telephone counseling (TTC) is effective in increasing utilization of screening mammography, but has received limited testing on a large scale in a contemporary HMO setting in which most eligible women get regular screening. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing TTC to an active control (mailed reminders) among women aged 50-80 enrolled in two HMOs in New England (n=12,905). Over a 1-year period counselors attempted to contact women in the intervention arm who had not had a mammogram within the last 15 months. The absolute increase in mammography use due to the intervention was 4.9% (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6) in one HMO and 3.1% (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0-1.3) in the other. We estimated that one additional woman was screened for each 10.9 women eligible for counseling. An intervention process analysis documented a high level of acceptance of TTC and identified subgroups that could be targeted for counseling to improve the efficiency of TTC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14642552     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2003.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  10 in total

1.  Helping men make an informed decision about prostate cancer screening: a pilot study of telephone counseling.

Authors:  Mary E Costanza; Roger S Luckmann; Milagros Rosal; Mary Jo White; Nancy LaPelle; Melissa Partin; Caroline Cranos; Katherine G Leung; Christine Foley
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-06-15

2.  Cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions: are appropriate statistical methods being used?

Authors:  Catherine M Crespi; Annette E Maxwell; Sheng Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.

Authors:  Roger Luckmann; Mary Jo White; Mary E Costanza; Christine F Frisard; Caroline Cranos; Susan Sama; Robert Yood
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Randomized trial of a lay health advisor and computer intervention to increase mammography screening in African American women.

Authors:  Kathleen M Russell; Victoria L Champion; Patrick O Monahan; Sandra Millon-Underwood; Qianqian Zhao; Nicole Spacey; Nathan L Rush; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Translation of an efficacious cancer-screening intervention to women enrolled in a Medicaid managed care organization.

Authors:  Allen J Dietrich; Jonathan N Tobin; Andrea Cassells; Christina M Robinson; Meredith Reh; Karen A Romero; Ann Barry Flood; Michael L Beach
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Stephanie J Sohl; Anne Moyer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Effect of a multimodal reminder program on repeat mammogram screening.

Authors:  Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; Jennifer Schneider; Mary M Rix; Kara Keels; Stephanie Schoap; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Design and methods for a randomized clinical trial comparing three outreach efforts to improve screening mammography adherence.

Authors:  Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Mary Jo White; Milagros C Rosal; Caroline Cranos; George Reed; Robin Clark; Susan Sama; Robert Yood
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The impact of translated reminder letters and phone calls on mammography screening booking rates: Two randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Alison Beauchamp; Mohammadreza Mohebbi; Annie Cooper; Vicki Pridmore; Patricia Livingston; Matthew Scanlon; Melissa Davis; Jonathan O'Hara; Richard Osborne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Uptake in cancer screening programmes: a priority in cancer control.

Authors:  D P Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.