BACKGROUND:Low-income African American women face numerous barriers to mammography screening. We tested the efficacy of a combined interactive computer program and lay health advisor intervention to increase mammography screening. METHODS: In this randomized, single blind study, participants were 181 African American female health center patients of ages 41 to 75 years, at < or =250% of poverty level, with no breast cancer history, and with no screening mammogram in the past 15 months. They were assigned to either (a) a low-dose comparison group consisting of a culturally appropriate mammography screening pamphlet or (b) interactive, tailored computer instruction at baseline and four monthly lay health advisor counseling sessions. Self-reported screening data were collected at baseline and 6 months and verified by medical record. RESULTS: For intent-to-treat analysis of primary outcome (medical record-verified mammography screening, available on all but two participants), the intervention group had increased screening to 51% (45 of 89) compared with 18% (16 of 90) for the comparison group at 6 months. When adjusted for employment status, disability, first-degree relatives with breast cancer, health insurance, and previous breast biopsies, the intervention group was three times more likely (adjusted relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.7; P < 0.0001) to get screened than the low-dose comparison group. Similar results were found for self-reported mammography stage of screening adoption. CONCLUSIONS: The combined intervention was efficacious in improving mammography screening in low-income African American women, with an unadjusted effect size (relative risk, 2.84) significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that in previous studies of each intervention alone.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Low-income African American women face numerous barriers to mammography screening. We tested the efficacy of a combined interactive computer program and lay health advisor intervention to increase mammography screening. METHODS: In this randomized, single blind study, participants were 181 African American female health center patients of ages 41 to 75 years, at < or =250% of poverty level, with no breast cancer history, and with no screening mammogram in the past 15 months. They were assigned to either (a) a low-dose comparison group consisting of a culturally appropriate mammography screening pamphlet or (b) interactive, tailored computer instruction at baseline and four monthly lay health advisor counseling sessions. Self-reported screening data were collected at baseline and 6 months and verified by medical record. RESULTS: For intent-to-treat analysis of primary outcome (medical record-verified mammography screening, available on all but two participants), the intervention group had increased screening to 51% (45 of 89) compared with 18% (16 of 90) for the comparison group at 6 months. When adjusted for employment status, disability, first-degree relatives with breast cancer, health insurance, and previous breast biopsies, the intervention group was three times more likely (adjusted relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.7; P < 0.0001) to get screened than the low-dose comparison group. Similar results were found for self-reported mammography stage of screening adoption. CONCLUSIONS: The combined intervention was efficacious in improving mammography screening in low-income African American women, with an unadjusted effect size (relative risk, 2.84) significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that in previous studies of each intervention alone.
Authors: E D Paskett; C M Tatum; R D'Agostino; J Rushing; R Velez; R Michielutte; M Dignan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: W Rakowski; B Ehrich; M G Goldstein; B K Rimer; D N Pearlman; M A Clark; W F Velicer; H Woolverton Journal: Prev Med Date: 1998 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Rachel K Klimmek; Elizabeth Noyes; Kristen Edington-Saunders; Claire Logue; Randy Jones; Jennifer Wenzel Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2012
Authors: Judy Huei-yu Wang; Marc D Schwartz; Roger L Brown; Annette E Maxwell; Marion M Lee; Inez F Adams; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-09-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Rachel C Shelton; Sheba King Dunston; Nicole Leoce; Lina Jandorf; Hayley S Thompson; Deborah O Erwin Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2016-07-09