Literature DB >> 20056639

Randomized trial of a lay health advisor and computer intervention to increase mammography screening in African American women.

Kathleen M Russell1, Victoria L Champion, Patrick O Monahan, Sandra Millon-Underwood, Qianqian Zhao, Nicole Spacey, Nathan L Rush, Electra D Paskett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-income African American women face numerous barriers to mammography screening. We tested the efficacy of a combined interactive computer program and lay health advisor intervention to increase mammography screening.
METHODS: In this randomized, single blind study, participants were 181 African American female health center patients of ages 41 to 75 years, at < or =250% of poverty level, with no breast cancer history, and with no screening mammogram in the past 15 months. They were assigned to either (a) a low-dose comparison group consisting of a culturally appropriate mammography screening pamphlet or (b) interactive, tailored computer instruction at baseline and four monthly lay health advisor counseling sessions. Self-reported screening data were collected at baseline and 6 months and verified by medical record.
RESULTS: For intent-to-treat analysis of primary outcome (medical record-verified mammography screening, available on all but two participants), the intervention group had increased screening to 51% (45 of 89) compared with 18% (16 of 90) for the comparison group at 6 months. When adjusted for employment status, disability, first-degree relatives with breast cancer, health insurance, and previous breast biopsies, the intervention group was three times more likely (adjusted relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-3.7; P < 0.0001) to get screened than the low-dose comparison group. Similar results were found for self-reported mammography stage of screening adoption.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined intervention was efficacious in improving mammography screening in low-income African American women, with an unadjusted effect size (relative risk, 2.84) significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that in previous studies of each intervention alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20056639      PMCID: PMC2818428          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  42 in total

Review 1.  The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; W F Velicer
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

2.  What's the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes.

Authors:  J Zhang; K F Yu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-18       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  What lay health advisors do: An evaluation of advisors' activities.

Authors:  J A Earp; V L Flax
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb

4.  Effect of a cancer screening intervention conducted by lay health workers among inner-city women.

Authors:  J F Sung; D S Blumenthal; R J Coates; J E Williams; E Alema-Mensah; J M Liff
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 5.  Participation in breast screening programs: a review.

Authors:  S W Vernon; E A Laville; G L Jackson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Breast cancer screening and African American women: fear, fatalism, and silence.

Authors:  J M Phillips; M Z Cohen; G Moses
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Community-based interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening: results of the Forsyth County Cancer Screening (FoCaS) Project.

Authors:  E D Paskett; C M Tatum; R D'Agostino; J Rushing; R Velez; R Michielutte; M Dignan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education.

Authors:  E Eng; J Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Stepped-care, community clinic interventions to promote mammography use among low-income rural African American women.

Authors:  Delia Smith West; Paul Greene; LeaVonne Pulley; Polly Kratt; Stacy Gore; Heidi Weiss; Nicole Siegfried
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2004-08

10.  Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention.

Authors:  W Rakowski; B Ehrich; M G Goldstein; B K Rimer; D N Pearlman; M A Clark; W F Velicer; H Woolverton
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.018

View more
  30 in total

1.  Intervention tailoring for Chinese American women: comparing the effects of two videos on knowledge, attitudes and intentions to obtain a mammogram.

Authors:  Judy Huei-yu Wang; Marc D Schwartz; George Luta; Annette E Maxwell; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-02-10

2.  Advancing understanding of the sustainability of lay health advisor (LHA) programs for African-American women in community settings.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Thana-Ashley Charles; Sheba King Dunston; Lina Jandorf; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Jill M Oliveri; Gregory S Young; Mira L Katz; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2015-10-19

4.  It's the amount of thought that counts: when ambivalence contributes to mammography screening delay.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer M Gierisch; Barbara K Rimer; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-11-03

5.  Access to Care as a Barrier to Mammography for Black Women.

Authors:  Mollie E Aleshire; Adebola Adegboyega; Omar A Escontrías; Jean Edward; Jennifer Hatcher
Journal:  Policy Polit Nurs Pract       Date:  2020-10-19

6.  Training of community health workers to deliver cancer patient navigation to rural African American seniors.

Authors:  Rachel K Klimmek; Elizabeth Noyes; Kristen Edington-Saunders; Claire Logue; Randy Jones; Jennifer Wenzel
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2012

7.  Results of a randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of a culturally targeted and a generic video on mammography screening among chinese-american immigrants.

Authors:  Judy Huei-yu Wang; Marc D Schwartz; Roger L Brown; Annette E Maxwell; Marion M Lee; Inez F Adams; Jeanne S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Individual, provider, and system risk factors for breast and cervical cancer screening among underserved Black, Latina, and Arab women.

Authors:  Leeanne Roman; Cristian Meghea; Sabrina Ford; Louis Penner; Hiam Hamade; Tamika Estes; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 9.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Advancing Understanding of the Characteristics and Capacity of African American Women Who Serve as Lay Health Advisors in Community-Based Settings.

Authors:  Rachel C Shelton; Sheba King Dunston; Nicole Leoce; Lina Jandorf; Hayley S Thompson; Deborah O Erwin
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2016-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.