Literature DB >> 14642459

Connectivity analysis with structural equation modelling: an example of the effects of voxel selection.

Miguel S Gonçalves1, Deborah A Hall.   

Abstract

Structural equation modelling (SEM) of neuroimaging data is commonly applied to a network of distributed brain regions. We applied SEM to an fMRI dataset to identify condition-specific effects in a simple experiment composed of visual stimulation and baseline conditions. The visual network was composed of three well-defined anatomical regions (V1, V2, and V5) and three path connections (V1 --> V2, V1 --> V5, and V2 --> V5). This network was used to test four hypotheses: (1) whether the condition-specific effects for all three connections vary according to the data selected for modelling; (2) whether the "summary" measures that are often used are indeed appropriate; (3) whether measures taken from the voxel timecourse can reliably predict the condition-specific effects for each one of the three path connections, and (4) whether all voxels within an anatomical region yield equivalent SEM outcomes. There was some variability in the significance of the condition-specific effects across randomly selected voxels within regions. However, the SEM outcome from the "summary" measures was comparable to the most frequent pattern of condition-specific effects. Magnitude, delay, spread, and goodness-of-fit measures taken from a gamma fit to the voxel time courses predicted reliably the significance of the SEM condition-specific effects for each connection. This result enabled us to identify spatially coherent regions at the boundaries of V2 that displayed different condition-specific effects from those seen in the majority of the voxels. Although the generality of these results awaits further investigation, this example highlights a number of important issues for SEM. We have provided further evidence that the SEM outcome does vary somewhat according to the voxels selected and that, although the use of summary measures can give a generalised view of the connectivity pattern, they could fail to capture functional differences within specialised areas.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14642459     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00394-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  14 in total

1.  Comparing functional connectivity via thresholding correlations and singular value decomposition.

Authors:  Keith J Worsley; Jen-I Chen; Jason Lerch; Alan C Evans
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Testing effective connectivity changes with structural equation modeling: what does a bad model tell us?

Authors:  Andrea B Protzner; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Functional connectivity estimation in fMRI data: influence of preprocessing and time course selection.

Authors:  Maria Gavrilescu; Geoffrey W Stuart; Susan Rossell; Katherine Henshall; Colette McKay; Alex A Sergejew; David Copolov; Gary F Egan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Interhemispheric integration of visual processing during task-driven lateralization.

Authors:  Klaas E Stephan; John C Marshall; Will D Penny; Karl J Friston; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity.

Authors:  Justin L Vincent; Itamar Kahn; Abraham Z Snyder; Marcus E Raichle; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mapping the connectivity with structural equation modeling in an fMRI study of shape-from-motion task.

Authors:  Jiancheng Zhuang; Scott Peltier; Sheng He; Stephen LaConte; Xiaoping Hu
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Approaches for the integrated analysis of structure, function and connectivity of the human brain.

Authors:  Simon B Eickhoff; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Learning partially directed functional networks from meta-analysis imaging data.

Authors:  Jane Neumann; Peter T Fox; Robert Turner; Gabriele Lohmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Neurophysiology and neuroanatomy of reflexive and volitional saccades: evidence from studies of humans.

Authors:  Jennifer E McDowell; Kara A Dyckman; Benjamin P Austin; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Network activation during bimanual movements in humans.

Authors:  R R Walsh; S L Small; E E Chen; A Solodkin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.