Literature DB >> 14640885

Sensitivity for global shape detection.

Rebecca L Achtman1, Robert F Hess, Yi-Zhong Wang.   

Abstract

In order to understand the nature of the mechanisms responsible for global shape detection, we measured coherence thresholds in a 2IFC task where subjects judged which of two arrays of Gabors contained global circular structure. The stimulus was composed of an array of oriented Gabor patches positioned on a polar grid. Thresholds were obtained for different array parameters (e.g. different area, density, number and positions of elements) as well as for different element parameters (e.g. different carrier spatial frequencies, contrasts, polarities and orientations). Global structure was detected when ~10% of the elements were coherently oriented. Neither the properties of the array (density, area, number or position of elements), nor those of the individual elements (carrier spatial frequency, contrast, polarity) altered coherence thresholds. Varying contrast or carrier spatial frequency within individual arrays also did not alter performance. Sensitivity was invariant to positional perturbations of the array grid. Only jittering the local orientation of elements decreased sensitivity. The underlying mechanisms are broadly tuned for contrast, spatial frequency and the spatial positioning of image samples. Detecting circular structure is a robust process and, in this case, a purely global one. Sensitivity was highest for circular as opposed to radial or spiral shapes.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14640885     DOI: 10.1167/3.10.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  12 in total

1.  Electrophysiological studies of texture recognition mechanisms.

Authors:  A K Kharauzov; Yu E Shelepin; S V Pronin; T V Sel'chenkova; Ya A Noskov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-03

2.  Differential human brain activation by vertical and horizontal global visual textures.

Authors:  Jane E Aspell; John Wattam-Bell; Janette Atkinson; Oliver J Braddick
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transfer of perceptual learning between different visual tasks.

Authors:  David P McGovern; Ben S Webb; Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Sensitivity and configuration-specificity of orientation-defined texture processing in infants and adults.

Authors:  Francesca Pei; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Ameliorating the combinatorial explosion with spatial frequency-matched combinations of V1 outputs.

Authors:  Sarah Hancock; David P McGovern; Jonathan W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Adaptation to implied tilt: extensive spatial extrapolation of orientation gradients.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Ben S Webb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-19

7.  Masking exposes multiple global form mechanisms.

Authors:  Ben S Webb; Neil W Roach; Jon W Peirce
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Set-size effects for sampled shapes: experiments and model.

Authors:  Christian Kempgens; Gunter Loffler; Harry S Orbach
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Top-down control in contour grouping.

Authors:  Gregor Volberg; Andreas Wutz; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Detecting shapes in noise: tuning characteristics of global shape mechanisms.

Authors:  Gunnar Schmidtmann; Gael E Gordon; David M Bennett; Gunter Loffler
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.