Literature DB >> 14638700

Five-year incidence of bilateral cause-specific visual impairment in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project.

Peter N Dimitrov1, Bickol N Mukesh, Catherine A McCarty, Hugh R Taylor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the age-, gender-, and cause-specific 5-year incidence of bilateral visual impairment in participants in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project, Victoria, Australia.
METHODS: Participants aged 40 years and older were recruited from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, by random cluster sampling. The mean age of the 3271 (83% of the eligible) participants was 59 +/- 12 (SD) years. Of the participants, 54% were female. The initial baseline study (1992-1994) was followed by a 5-year incidence study (1997-1999). At both time points of the study, participants underwent a standardized testing procedure. Distance and near vision was tested using logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) charts, followed by refraction if needed. Visual fields were assessed by the 24-2 Humphrey field test (FastPac, Humphrey Field Analyzer; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Also, intraocular pressure, ocular motility, dilated ophthalmoscopy, and photography of the lens and the fundus were conducted. Furthermore, an interview included demographic characteristics, history of eye disease, medical history, and medication use. For classification of visual impairment, both visual acuity (VA) and visual fields (VF) examination results were used. Four levels of bilateral presenting visual impairment were defined: mild (VA, <20/40-20/60, and/or VF, homonymous hemianopia), moderate (VA, <20/60-20/200, and/or VF, constriction <20 degrees to 10 degrees from fixation), severe (VA, <20/200-10/200, and/or VF, constriction <10 degrees to 5 degrees from fixation), and profound (VA, <10/200, and/or VF, constriction <5 degrees from fixation). For all participants found to be visually impaired, the major cause was identified.
RESULTS: Of the 3040 people eligible to attend follow-up 2594 (85%) participated. Data were available for 2530 (98%) participants. In 105 participants (4.22%; 95% confidence limit 2.58-5.85) some degree of visual impairment developed. The main causes were undercorrected refractive error (59%), age-related macular degeneration, cataract and neuro-ophthalmic disorders (7% each), glaucoma (3%), and diabetic retinopathy (1%). The main cause of severe and profound visual impairment was age-related macular degeneration (37%).
CONCLUSIONS: Undercorrected refractive error was the primary cause of new cases of visual impairment in this population. Further research is needed to understand the origin of this and to develop appropriate prevention measures. Age-related macular degeneration is the primary cause of severe or profound vision loss in Australia. This disease requires further investigation for effective cure and preventive strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14638700     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  20 in total

1.  Seven-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error among an elderly Chinese population in Shihpai, Taiwan: The Shihpai Eye Study.

Authors:  T-M Kuang; S-Y Tsai; C J-L Liu; Y-C Ko; S-M Lee; P Chou
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Mitochondrial disorders and the eye.

Authors:  Nicole J Van Bergen; Rahul Chakrabarti; Evelyn C O'Neill; Jonathan G Crowston; Ian A Trounce
Journal:  Eye Brain       Date:  2011-09-26

3.  Uncorrected refractive error in a Latino population: proyecto VER.

Authors:  Jorge A Uribe; Bonnielin K Swenor; Beatriz E Muñoz; Sheila K West
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Risk factors for four-year incident visual impairment and blindness: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Yonekawa; Rohit Varma; Farzana Choudhury; Mina Torres; Stanley P Azen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The impact of eyeglasses on vision-related quality of life in American Indian/Alaska Natives.

Authors:  Tina M McClure; Dongseok Choi; Kathleen Wooten; Chris Nield; Thomas M Becker; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  A genomewide scan identifies novel early-onset primary open-angle glaucoma loci on 9q22 and 20p12.

Authors:  J L Wiggs; S Lynch; G Ynagi; M Maselli; J Auguste; E A Del Bono; L M Olson; J L Haines
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-04-23       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  New systematic review methodology for visual impairment and blindness for the 2010 Global Burden of Disease study.

Authors:  Rupert Bourne; Holly Price; Hugh Taylor; Janet Leasher; Jill Keeffe; Julie Glanville; Pamela C Sieving; Moncef Khairallah; Tien Yin Wong; Yingfeng Zheng; Anu Mathew; Suchitra Katiyar; Maya Mascarenhas; Gretchen A Stevens; Serge Resnikoff; Stephen Gichuhi; Kovin Naidoo; Diane Wallace; Steven Kymes; Colleen Peters; Konrad Pesudovs; Tasanee Braithwaite; Hans Limburg
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.648

8.  Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in Japanese patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD): results of the Japanese AMD Trial (JAT) extension.

Authors:  Masahito Ohji
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Sources of binocular suprathreshold visual field loss in a cohort of older women being followed for risk of falls (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Anne Louise Coleman
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2007

10.  Using the electroretinogram to understand how intraocular pressure elevation affects the rat retina.

Authors:  Bang V Bui; Zheng He; Algis J Vingrys; Christine T O Nguyen; Vickie H Y Wong; Brad Fortune
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.