Literature DB >> 14634420

Urinary continence and quality of life in the first year after radical perineal prostatectomy.

Matthew D Young1, Alon Z Weizer, Ari D Silverstein, Alfonso Crisci, David M Albala, Johannes Vieweg, David F Paulson, Philipp Dahm.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We attempt to characterize the return of urinary continence and urinary domain related quality of life objectively after radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 92 RPP candidates were prospectively enrolled in a quality of life (QOL) survey using a validated assessment tool and evaluated before surgery, and then after surgery at 1 month and subsequent 3-month intervals. The time to regain continence based on 3 different definitions and the time to recover baseline urinary domain related QOL was calculated.
RESULTS: Median time to regain continence after RPP ranged from 3.0 to 3.3 months depending on the definition of continence. Median time for patients to regain continence depending on age (younger than 55, 55 to 64 and older than 64) and medical comorbidities (none, 1 and 2 or more) varied between 1.4 +/- 0.3, 3.0 +/- 0.9 and 3.3 +/- 0.4 months, respectively (p = 0.028), and 1.4 +/- 0.2, 3.3 +/- 0.2 and 3.5 +/- 2.6 months, respectively (p = 0.009). Twelve months after RPP 84%, 66% and 82% of patients regained individual baseline urinary summary, function and bother scores, respectively. Postoperative radiation (XRT) represented the only independent predictor of the time to recover baseline urinary domain summary scores in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.042) with a median delay in the XRT (10 patients) and nonXRT group (82 patients) of 8.0 and 6.7 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on self-reported questionnaire data, a majority of patients regain urinary continence and urinary domain related QOL within 12 months after RPP. The time course of recovery from radical prostatectomy represents an important outcome criterion that should be shared with patients considering treatment options.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14634420     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000097240.99415.a7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  8 in total

1.  Open versus laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

2.  Complete bladder neck preservation promotes long-term post-prostatectomy continence without compromising midterm oncological outcome: analysis of a randomised controlled cohort.

Authors:  Joanne N Nyarangi-Dix; Diana Tichy; Gencay Hatiboglu; Sascha Pahernik; Georgi Tosev; Markus Hohenfellner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Recovery of urinary function after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical perineal prostatectomy for early-stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Mohammad Jafri; Laura N Nguyen; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence: Etiology, evaluation, and management.

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-03

5.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bladder neck preservation: positive surgical margin and urinary continence status.

Authors:  Tomasz Golabek; Jaroslaw Jaskulski; Piotr Jarecki; Przemysław Dudek; Tomasz Szopiński; Piotr Chłosta
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 1.195

Review 6.  Effect of Bladder Neck Preservation on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jong Won Kim; Do Kyung Kim; Hyun Kyu Ahn; Hae Do Jung; Joo Yong Lee; Kang Su Cho
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Bladder neck sparing during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Six-year experience.

Authors:  Sercan Yilmaz; Esat Ak; Eymen Gazel; Serdar Yalcin; Kenan Yigit Yildiz; Lutfi Tunc
Journal:  North Clin Istanb       Date:  2021-05-24

8.  Retzius-sparing versus standard robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Joel E Rosenberg; Jae Hung Jung; Zach Edgerton; Hunju Lee; Solam Lee; Caitlin J Bakker; Philipp Dahm
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-08-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.