BACKGROUND: Intestinal epithelial cells secrete exosome-like vesicles. The aim of this study was to characterise murine intestinal epithelial exosomes and to analyse their capacity to inform the immune system in vivo in mice. METHODS: Epithelial exosomes were obtained from the murine epithelial cell line MODE K incubated in the presence or absence of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) together with pepsin/trypsin ovalbumin hydrolysate (hOVA) to mimic luminal digestion. Exosomes isolated from MODE K conditioned media (EXO-hOVA and EXO-hOVA-IFN) were characterised by western blot, peptide mapping, and mass spectrometry. They were injected intraperitoneally to C3H/HeN mice to test their immunocompetence. RESULTS: MODE K epithelial exosomes displayed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II (upregulated by IFN-gamma) molecules and tetraspan proteins (CD9, CD81, CD82) potentially involved in the binding to target cells. A33 antigen, an Ig-like molecule highly specific for intestinal epithelial cells, was enriched in exosomes and was also found in mice mesenteric lymph nodes, suggesting exosome migration towards the gut associated lymphoid tissues. Intraperitoneal injection of EXO-hOVA or EXO-hOVA-IFN did not induce humoral or cellular tolerance to OVA in mice. In contrast, exosomes obtained after incubation with IFN-gamma (EXO-hOVA-IFN), bearing abundant MHC class II/OVA complexes, induced a specific humoral immune response. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial exosomes are antigen presenting vesicles bearing MHC class II/peptide complexes that prime for an immunogenic rather than tolerogenic response in the context of a systemic challenge. In the intestine, both the mucosal microenvironment and local effector cells are probably key players in determining the outcome of the immune response to exosome derived epitopes.
BACKGROUND: Intestinal epithelial cells secrete exosome-like vesicles. The aim of this study was to characterise murine intestinal epithelial exosomes and to analyse their capacity to inform the immune system in vivo in mice. METHODS: Epithelial exosomes were obtained from the murine epithelial cell line MODE K incubated in the presence or absence of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) together with pepsin/trypsin ovalbumin hydrolysate (hOVA) to mimic luminal digestion. Exosomes isolated from MODE K conditioned media (EXO-hOVA and EXO-hOVA-IFN) were characterised by western blot, peptide mapping, and mass spectrometry. They were injected intraperitoneally to C3H/HeN mice to test their immunocompetence. RESULTS: MODE K epithelial exosomes displayed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and class II (upregulated by IFN-gamma) molecules and tetraspan proteins (CD9, CD81, CD82) potentially involved in the binding to target cells. A33 antigen, an Ig-like molecule highly specific for intestinal epithelial cells, was enriched in exosomes and was also found in mice mesenteric lymph nodes, suggesting exosome migration towards the gut associated lymphoid tissues. Intraperitoneal injection of EXO-hOVA or EXO-hOVA-IFN did not induce humoral or cellular tolerance to OVA in mice. In contrast, exosomes obtained after incubation with IFN-gamma (EXO-hOVA-IFN), bearing abundant MHC class II/OVA complexes, induced a specific humoral immune response. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelial exosomes are antigen presenting vesicles bearing MHC class II/peptide complexes that prime for an immunogenic rather than tolerogenic response in the context of a systemic challenge. In the intestine, both the mucosal microenvironment and local effector cells are probably key players in determining the outcome of the immune response to exosome derived epitopes.
Authors: M Rescigno; M Urbano; B Valzasina; M Francolini; G Rotta; R Bonasio; F Granucci; J P Kraehenbuhl; P Ricciardi-Castagnoli Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: T Rabilloud; S Kieffer; V Procaccio; M Louwagie; P L Courchesne; S D Patterson; P Martinez; J Garin; J Lunardi Journal: Electrophoresis Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 3.535
Authors: J Wolfers; A Lozier; G Raposo; A Regnault; C Théry; C Masurier; C Flament; S Pouzieux; F Faure; T Tursz; E Angevin; S Amigorena; L Zitvogel Journal: Nat Med Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: C N Johnstone; N C Tebbutt; H E Abud; S J White; K L Stenvers; N E Hall; S H Cody; R H Whitehead; B Catimel; E C Nice; A W Burgess; J K Heath Journal: Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 4.052
Authors: C Théry; A Regnault; J Garin; J Wolfers; L Zitvogel; P Ricciardi-Castagnoli; G Raposo; S Amigorena Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 1999-11-01 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Elham Hosseini-Beheshti; Steven Pham; Hans Adomat; Na Li; Emma S Tomlinson Guns Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Mehmet Kesimer; Margaret Scull; Brian Brighton; Genevieve DeMaria; Kimberlie Burns; Wanda O'Neal; Raymond J Pickles; John K Sheehan Journal: FASEB J Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: David G Menter; Sherri L Patterson; Craig D Logsdon; Scott Kopetz; Anil K Sood; Ernest T Hawk Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2014-07-24
Authors: Emely A Hoffman; Kristin M Perkumas; Lindsey M Highstrom; W Daniel Stamer Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2008-10-24 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Yuehui Wang; Sarbani Ghoshal; Martin Ward; Willem de Villiers; Jerold Woodward; Erik Eckhardt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-12-24 Impact factor: 3.240