Literature DB >> 14633543

A pilot study to evaluate the SMART BAG: a new pressure-responsive, gas-flow limiting bag-valve-mask device.

Horst G Wagner-Berger1, Volker Wenzel, Wolfgang G Voelckel, Klaus Rheinberger, Karl H Stadlbauer, Tilko Müller, Sven Augenstein, Achim von Goedecke, Karl H Lindner, Christian Keller.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Reducing inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure may be important to minimize the risk of stomach inflation when ventilating an unprotected airway with positive pressure ventilation. In this study, we assessed the effects of a standard self-inflating bag compared with a new pressure-responsive, inspiratory gas flow-limiting device (SMART BAG) on respiratory mechanics in 60 adult patients undergoing routine induction of anesthesia. Respiratory variables were measured using a pulmonary monitor. The SMART BAG resulted in significantly decreased inspiratory flow rate and peak airway pressure while providing adequate tidal volume delivery. IMPLICATIONS: The SMART BAG, a new pressure-responsive, peak inspiratory gas flow-limiting bag-valve mask device, limits inspiratory gas flow from up to 120 L/min in a standard self-inflating bag to approximately 40 L/min. It is designed for use by all levels of health care professionals and has been proven in a clinical pilot study to effectively ventilate patients in respiratory arrest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14633543     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000087064.29929.ce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

Review 1.  [The new 2005 resuscitation guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council: comments and supplements].

Authors:  V Wenzel; S Russo; H R Arntz; J Bahr; M A Baubin; B W Böttiger; B Dirks; V Dörges; C Eich; M Fischer; B Wolcke; S Schwab; W G Voelckel; H W Gervais
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  [Ventilation of an unprotected airway: evaluation of a new peak-inspiratory-flow and airway-pressure-limiting bag-valve-mask].

Authors:  A von Goedecke; P Paal; C Keller; W G Voelckel; H Herff; K H Lindner; V Wenzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Mask ventilation as an exit strategy of endotracheal intubation].

Authors:  A von Goedecke; C Keller; W G Voelckel; M Dünser; P Paal; C Torgersen; V Wenzel
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  Smart Bag vs. Standard bag in the temporary substitution of the mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Robin Lovat; Christine Watremez; Michel Van Dyck; Olivier Van Caenegem; Franck Verschuren; Philippe Hantson; Luc-Marie Jacquet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  [Ultrasound assessment of gastric insufflation in obese patients receiving transnasal humidified rapid-insufflation ventilatory exchange during general anesthesia induction].

Authors:  Weiqing Jiang; Li Shi; Qian Zhao; Wenwen Zhang; Man Xu; Wanling Wang; Xiaoliang Wang; Hongguang Bao; Jing Leng; Li Jiang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2020-11-30

Review 6.  Performance of manual ventilation: how to define its efficiency in bench studies? A review of the literature.

Authors:  A Khoury; A De Luca; F S Sall; L Pazart; G Capellier
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 6.955

7.  Evaluation of Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation in Manikin Studies: What Are the Current Limitations?

Authors:  A Khoury; F S Sall; A De Luca; A Pugin; S Pili-Floury; L Pazart; G Capellier
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.