Literature DB >> 16609886

[Ventilation of an unprotected airway: evaluation of a new peak-inspiratory-flow and airway-pressure-limiting bag-valve-mask].

A von Goedecke1, P Paal, C Keller, W G Voelckel, H Herff, K H Lindner, V Wenzel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently 30 chest compressions and 2 ventilations with an inspiratory time of 1 s are recommended during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with an unprotected airway, thus spending about 15% instead of 40% of resuscitation time on ventilation. Time could be gained for chest compressions when reducing inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s, however, stomach inflation may increase as well.
METHODS: In an established bench model we evaluated the effect of reducing inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s at different lower oesophageal sphincter pressure (LOSP) levels using a novel peak inspiratory-flow and peak airway-pressure-limiting bag-valve-mask device (Smart-Bag).
RESULTS: A reduction of inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s resulted in significantly lower peak airway pressure with LOSP of 0.49 kPa (5 cm H2O), 0.98 kPa (10 cm H2O) and 1.47 kPa (15 cm H2O) and an increase with 1.96 kPa (20 cm H2O). Lung tidal volume was reduced with 1 s compared to 2 s. When reducing inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s, stomach inflation occurred only at a LOSP of 0.49 kPa (5 cm H2O).
CONCLUSIONS: In this model of a simulated unprotected airway, a reduction of inspiratory time from 2 s to 1 s using the Smart-Bag resulted in comparable inspiratory peak airway pressure and lower, but clinically comparable, lung tidal volume. Stomach inflation occurred only at a LOSP of 0.49 kPa (5 cm H2O), and was higher with an inspiratory time of 2 s vs 1 s.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16609886     DOI: 10.1007/s00101-006-1013-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesist        ISSN: 0003-2417            Impact factor:   1.041


  30 in total

1.  In this issue

Authors: 
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2000-08-23       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Effects of smaller tidal volumes during basic life support ventilation in patients with respiratory arrest: good ventilation, less risk?

Authors:  V Wenzel; C Keller; A H Idris; V Dörges; K H Lindner; J R Brimacombe
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Lars Wik; Jo Kramer-Johansen; Helge Myklebust; Hallstein Sørebø; Leif Svensson; Bob Fellows; Petter Andreas Steen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support.

Authors:  Jerry P Nolan; Charles D Deakin; Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Gary Smith
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Difference in acid-base state between venous and arterial blood during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  M H Weil; E C Rackow; R Trevino; W Grundler; J L Falk; M I Griffel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Effects of decreasing peak flow rate on stomach inflation during bag-valve-mask ventilation.

Authors:  Achim von Goedecke; Horst G Wagner-Berger; Karl H Stadlbauer; Anette C Krismer; Juliusz Jakubaszko; Christian Bratschke; Volker Wenzel; Christian Keller
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Survival and neurologic outcome after cardiopulmonary resuscitation with four different chest compression-ventilation ratios.

Authors:  Arthur B Sanders; Karl B Kern; Robert A Berg; Ronald W Hilwig; Joseph Heidenrich; Gordon A Ewy
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 8.  ["Topless" cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Fashion or science?].

Authors:  K Markstaller; B Eberle; W F Dick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Delaying defibrillation to give basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation to patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Lars Wik; Trond Boye Hansen; Frode Fylling; Thorbjørn Steen; Per Vaagenes; Bjørn H Auestad; Petter Andreas Steen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  L Wik; P A Steen; N G Bircher
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.262

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Death due to (no) airway. Adverse events by out-of-hospital airway management?].

Authors:  S G Russo; W Zink; H Herff; C H R Wiese
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.041

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.