Literature DB >> 14629882

Management of primary and recurrent inguinal hernia by surgeons from the South West of England.

S K Richards1, J J Earnshaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) has advocated open mesh repair for primary hernia but suggested laparoscopic repair may be considered for recurrent hernias. AIM: To establish current surgical practice by surgeons from the South West of England.
METHODS: A postal survey was distributed to 121 consultant surgeons and a response rate of 75% was achieved.
RESULTS: The majority (86%) of the surgeons surveyed performed hernia repairs, and most (95%) of these used open mesh repair as standard for primary inguinal hernia. Only 8% used laparoscopic repair routinely for primary hernias. Few consultants (only 28%) were able to quote formally audited hernia recurrence rates. A total of 90% of respondents still employed open mesh repair routinely for recurrent hernias; however, if mesh had been used for the primary repair, this figure fell to 55%. Some 7% of respondents recommended laparoscopic repair for recurrent hernia, but this increased to 17% if the primary repair was done with mesh. All laparoscopic surgeons in the South West employed the totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP). There was a range of opinion on the technical demands of repair of a recurrent hernia previously mended with mesh; the commonest cause of mesh failure was thought to be a medial direct recurrence (insufficient mesh medially).
CONCLUSIONS: Current surgical practice for primary hernias in the South West England reflects NICE guidelines although many surgeons continue to manage recurrent hernias by further open repair. In this survey, there was anecdotal evidence to suggest that hernia recurrence can be managed effectively by open repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14629882      PMCID: PMC1964431          DOI: 10.1308/003588403322520780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

Authors:  Nilay R Shah; Dean J Mikami; Charles Cook; Andrei Manilchuk; Clayton Hodges; Vanchad R Memark; Eric T Volckmann; Clinton R Hall; Steven Steinberg; Bradley Needleman; Jeffrey W Hazey; W Scott Melvin; Vimal K Narula
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia.

Authors:  S K Richards; M N Vipond; J J Earnshaw
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Management of recurrent inguinal hernia at a tertiary care hospital of southern Sindh, Pakistan.

Authors:  Ahmer A Memon; Faisal G Siddiqui; Arshad H Abro; Ahmed H Agha; Shahzadi Lubna; Abdul S Memon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Open preperitoneal mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia.

Authors:  K M Katri
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Recurrent inguinal hernia due to mesh dissolution: two case reports.

Authors:  M Shamim
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Open Repair of Primary Versus Recurrent Male Unilateral Inguinal Hernias: Perioperative Complications and 1-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  F Köckerling; A Koch; R Lorenz; W Reinpold; M Hukauf; C Schug-Pass
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laparo-endoscopic versus open recurrent inguinal hernia repair: should we follow the guidelines?

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Bittner; A Kuthe; B Stechemesser; R Lorenz; A Koch; W Reinpold; H Niebuhr; M Hukauf; C Schug-Pass
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.584

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.