Literature DB >> 21298523

A comparison of outcomes between open and laparoscopic surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

Nilay R Shah1, Dean J Mikami, Charles Cook, Andrei Manilchuk, Clayton Hodges, Vanchad R Memark, Eric T Volckmann, Clinton R Hall, Steven Steinberg, Bradley Needleman, Jeffrey W Hazey, W Scott Melvin, Vimal K Narula.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia recurrence after surgical repair is a major concern. The authors report their experience with open and laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.
METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a retrospective review was performed with the charts of 197 patients who had undergone surgical repair of recurrent inguinal hernias from January 2000 through August 2009, and the data for 172 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. Surgical variables and clinical outcomes were compared using Student's t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square, and Fisher's exact test as appropriate.
RESULTS: The review showed that 172 patients had undergone either open mesh repair (n=61) or laparoscopic mesh repair (n=111) for recurrent inguinal hernias. Postoperative complications were experienced by 8 patients in the open group and 17 patients in laparoscopic group (p=0.70). Five patients (8.2%) in the open group and four patients (3.6%) in the laparoscopic group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p=0.28). Four patients in the open group (9.5%) and no patients in the laparoscopic group had recurrence during long-term follow-up evaluation (p=0.046). In the laparoscopic group, 76 patients (68.5%) underwent total extraperitoneal (TEP) repair, and 35 patients (31.5%) had transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) repair. Postoperative complications were experienced by 13 patients in the TEP group and 4 patients in the TAPP group (p=0.44). Two patients (2.6%) in the TEP group and two patients (5.7%) in the TAPP group had re-recurrent inguinal hernias (p=0.59).
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review showed no statistical difference in the re-recurrence rate between the two techniques during short-term follow-up evaluation. However, the laparoscopic technique had a significantly lower re-recurrence rate than the open technique during long-term follow-up evaluation. Both procedures were comparable in terms of intra- and postoperative complications. Among laparoscopic techniques, TEP and TAPP repair are acceptable methods for the repair of recurrent inguinal hernia. A multicenter prospective randomized control trial is needed to confirm the findings of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21298523     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1564-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  42 in total

1.  Recurrent inguinal hernia: a ten-year review.

Authors:  Xavier Feliu; Eduardo Jaurrieta; Xavier Viñas; Enric Macarulla; Joseph Maria Abad; Enrique Fernández-Sallent
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.878

2.  Hernia surgery changes in the Amsterdam region 1994-2001: decrease in operations for recurrent hernia.

Authors:  T J Aufenacker; D H de Lange; M D Burg; B W Kuiken; E F Hensen; I G Schoots; D J Gouma; M P Simons
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 3.  Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  James E Everhart; Constance E Ruhl
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 22.682

4.  Re-recurrence after operation for recurrent inguinal hernia. A nationwide 8-year follow-up study on the role of type of repair.

Authors:  Thue Bisgaard; Morten Bay-Nielsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The tension-free hernioplasty.

Authors:  I L Lichtenstein; A G Shulman; P K Amid; M M Montllor
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Quality assessment of 26,304 herniorrhaphies in Denmark: a prospective nationwide study.

Authors:  M Bay-Nielsen; H Kehlet; L Strand; J Malmstrøm; F H Andersen; P Wara; P Juul; T Callesen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair of recurrent inguinal hernias.

Authors:  P Sayad; G Ferzli
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.878

8.  Comparison of endoscopic techniques vs Shouldice and other open nonmesh techniques for inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  R Bittner; S Sauerland; C-G Schmedt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Reoperation after recurrent groin hernia repair.

Authors:  S Haapaniemi; U Gunnarsson; P Nordin; E Nilsson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  14 in total

1.  Bilateral endoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair does not induce obstructive azoospermia: data of a retrospective and prospective trial.

Authors:  Markus Schäfer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus open preperitoneal mesh repair for inguinal hernia recurrence: a decision analysis based on net health benefits.

Authors:  George Sgourakis; Georgia Dedemadi; Ines Gockel; Irene Schmidtmann; Sophocles Lanitis; Paraskevi Zaphiriadou; Athanasios Papatheodorou; Constantine Karaliotas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  TAPP or TEP for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia? Population-Based Analysis of Prospective Data on 1309 Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Repair for Recurrent Inguinal Hernia.

Authors:  M Gass; A Scheiwiller; M Sykora; J Metzger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Francesco Puccetti; Ugo Elmore; Simonetta Massaron; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Transplant ureteric stenosis complicating laparoscopic recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

Authors:  G H Tse; M Clancy
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 6.  Male infertility following inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  A Kordzadeh; M O Liu; N V Jayanthi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients previously having prostatectomy is feasible, safe, and effective.

Authors:  Philip Le Page; Ania Smialkowski; Jonathan Morton; Douglas Fenton-Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  International guidelines for groin hernia management.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17,587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Authors:  F Köckerling; R Bittner; D A Jacob; L Seidelmann; T Keller; D Adolf; B Kraft; A Kuthe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Single-incision laparoscopic intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair for the treatment of multiple recurrent inguinal hernias.

Authors:  Hanh Minh Tran; Kim Tran; Marta Zajkowska; Vincent Lam; Wayne Hawthorne
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.