Literature DB >> 14628887

Staging of pelvic endometriosis based on MRI findings versus laparoscopic classification according to the American Fertility Society.

R Zanardi1, C Del Frate, C Zuiani, M Bazzocchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative staging of pelvic endometriosis helps the gynecologist plan therapy and offers a prognosis to patients. We compared a staging system of pelvic endometriosis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with the American Fertility Society (AFS) laparoscopic classification.
METHODS: Forty-four consecutive females with clinically suspected endometriosis underwent MRI examination to demonstrate the presence of endometriomas and pelvic implants. Laparoscopy was performed within 2 weeks. An MRI score was developed to classify endometriosis into four classes comparable to those of AFS laparoscopic staging. Concordance between MRI and laparoscopic classification was evaluated with kappa statistics.
RESULTS: Laparoscopy confirmed 60 of 61 endometriomas detected by MRI. Implants were discovered in 20 of 44 patients with MRI and in 23 of 44 with laparoscopy. MRI detected 50 endometrial implants of 65 detected by laparoscopy (76.9%). With regard to endometriosis staging, we obtained a concordance between MRI and AFS classification in 42 of 44 patients (kappa = 0.913).
CONCLUSION: Although MRI has limitations such as suboptimal depiction of small implants and adhesions, this technique is very useful to guide laparoscopy. Moreover, the optimal concordance (95%) between our proposed MRI staging and the AFS laparoscopic classification demonstrated a new advantage of MRI in preoperative staging of endometriosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14628887     DOI: 10.1007/s00261-003-0005-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Abdom Imaging        ISSN: 0942-8925


  11 in total

1.  Indeterminate adnexal masses at ultrasound: effect of MRI imaging findings on diagnostic thinking and therapeutic decisions.

Authors:  Bianka Chilla; Nik Hauser; Gad Singer; Mafalda Trippel; Johannes M Froehlich; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

3.  Incidence of endometriosis by study population and diagnostic method: the ENDO study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; C Matthew Peterson; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Zhen Chen; Victor Y Fujimoto; Michael W Varner; Ann Trumble; Linda C Giudice
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  MRI for the diagnosis and staging of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: a national survey of BSGE accredited endometriosis centres and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marianne Wild; Shikha Pandhi; John Rendle; Ian Swift; Emmanuel Ofuasia
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Nigel D'Souza; Georgina Hicks; Richard Beable; Antony Higginson; Bo Rud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-12-14

6.  Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  M Chassang; S Novellas; C Bloch-Marcotte; J Delotte; O Toullalan; A Bongain; P Chevallier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Trace elements and endometriosis: the ENDO study.

Authors:  Anna Z Pollack; Germaine M Buck Louis; Zhen Chen; C Matthew Peterson; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Mary S Croughan; Liping Sun; Mary L Hediger; Joseph B Stanford; Michael W Varner; Christopher D Palmer; Amy J Steuerwald; Patrick J Parsons
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.143

8.  Bisphenol A and phthalates and endometriosis: the Endometriosis: Natural History, Diagnosis and Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; C Matthew Peterson; Zhen Chen; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Michael W Varner; Anne Kennedy; Linda Giudice; Victor Y Fujimoto; Liping Sun; Lei Wang; Ying Guo; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Risk profiles for endometriosis in Japanese women: results from a repeated survey of self-reports.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Yasui; Kunihiko Hayashi; Kazue Nagai; Hideki Mizunuma; Toshiro Kubota; Jung-Su Lee; Shosuke Suzuki
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 3.211

10.  European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis.

Authors:  M Bazot; N Bharwani; C Huchon; K Kinkel; T M Cunha; A Guerra; L Manganaro; L Buñesch; A Kido; K Togashi; I Thomassin-Naggara; A G Rockall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.