BACKGROUND: Preoperative staging of pelvic endometriosis helps the gynecologist plan therapy and offers a prognosis to patients. We compared a staging system of pelvic endometriosis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with the American Fertility Society (AFS) laparoscopic classification. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive females with clinically suspected endometriosis underwent MRI examination to demonstrate the presence of endometriomas and pelvic implants. Laparoscopy was performed within 2 weeks. An MRI score was developed to classify endometriosis into four classes comparable to those of AFS laparoscopic staging. Concordance between MRI and laparoscopic classification was evaluated with kappa statistics. RESULTS: Laparoscopy confirmed 60 of 61 endometriomas detected by MRI. Implants were discovered in 20 of 44 patients with MRI and in 23 of 44 with laparoscopy. MRI detected 50 endometrial implants of 65 detected by laparoscopy (76.9%). With regard to endometriosis staging, we obtained a concordance between MRI and AFS classification in 42 of 44 patients (kappa = 0.913). CONCLUSION: Although MRI has limitations such as suboptimal depiction of small implants and adhesions, this technique is very useful to guide laparoscopy. Moreover, the optimal concordance (95%) between our proposed MRI staging and the AFS laparoscopic classification demonstrated a new advantage of MRI in preoperative staging of endometriosis.
BACKGROUND: Preoperative staging of pelvic endometriosis helps the gynecologist plan therapy and offers a prognosis to patients. We compared a staging system of pelvic endometriosis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings with the American Fertility Society (AFS) laparoscopic classification. METHODS: Forty-four consecutive females with clinically suspected endometriosis underwent MRI examination to demonstrate the presence of endometriomas and pelvic implants. Laparoscopy was performed within 2 weeks. An MRI score was developed to classify endometriosis into four classes comparable to those of AFS laparoscopic staging. Concordance between MRI and laparoscopic classification was evaluated with kappa statistics. RESULTS: Laparoscopy confirmed 60 of 61 endometriomas detected by MRI. Implants were discovered in 20 of 44 patients with MRI and in 23 of 44 with laparoscopy. MRI detected 50 endometrial implants of 65 detected by laparoscopy (76.9%). With regard to endometriosis staging, we obtained a concordance between MRI and AFS classification in 42 of 44 patients (kappa = 0.913). CONCLUSION: Although MRI has limitations such as suboptimal depiction of small implants and adhesions, this technique is very useful to guide laparoscopy. Moreover, the optimal concordance (95%) between our proposed MRI staging and the AFS laparoscopic classification demonstrated a new advantage of MRI in preoperative staging of endometriosis.
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; Mary L Hediger; C Matthew Peterson; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Zhen Chen; Victor Y Fujimoto; Michael W Varner; Ann Trumble; Linda C Giudice Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: M Chassang; S Novellas; C Bloch-Marcotte; J Delotte; O Toullalan; A Bongain; P Chevallier Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Anna Z Pollack; Germaine M Buck Louis; Zhen Chen; C Matthew Peterson; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Mary S Croughan; Liping Sun; Mary L Hediger; Joseph B Stanford; Michael W Varner; Christopher D Palmer; Amy J Steuerwald; Patrick J Parsons Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Germaine M Buck Louis; C Matthew Peterson; Zhen Chen; Mary Croughan; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Joseph Stanford; Michael W Varner; Anne Kennedy; Linda Giudice; Victor Y Fujimoto; Liping Sun; Lei Wang; Ying Guo; Kurunthachalam Kannan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2013-04-08 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: M Bazot; N Bharwani; C Huchon; K Kinkel; T M Cunha; A Guerra; L Manganaro; L Buñesch; A Kido; K Togashi; I Thomassin-Naggara; A G Rockall Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 5.315