BACKGROUND: We assessed the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying nonmalignant intraductal papillary mucinous tumors (IPMTs) of the pancreas. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with branch duct-type IPMT diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were prospectively examined with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography followed by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI examinations, and patients with no findings suggestive of malignancy, including a solid mass, mural nodules, a main pancreatic duct wider than 5 mm in diameter, and stenosis of the main pancreatic duct, were prospectively followed up with sequential MRI examinations once or twice a year. RESULTS: Twenty-six (79%) patients showed no findings suggestive of malignancy in the initial MRI examination. The diameter (mean +/- standard error) of the main pancreatic duct was 3.9 +/- 0.7 mm and that of the ectatic branch pancreatic duct was 36.0 +/- 9.1 mm. Twenty-three patients were prospectively followed for more than 36 months and 22 of them showed no findings suggestive of malignancy during follow-up periods ranging from 39 to 77 months (mean = 55 months). CONCLUSION: MRI was useful to identify nonmalignant IPMTs of the branch duct type, and close follow-up observation with serial MRI examinations may be appropriate in the management of such patients.
BACKGROUND: We assessed the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying nonmalignant intraductal papillary mucinous tumors (IPMTs) of the pancreas. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with branch duct-type IPMT diagnosed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were prospectively examined with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography followed by dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MRI examinations, and patients with no findings suggestive of malignancy, including a solid mass, mural nodules, a main pancreatic duct wider than 5 mm in diameter, and stenosis of the main pancreatic duct, were prospectively followed up with sequential MRI examinations once or twice a year. RESULTS: Twenty-six (79%) patients showed no findings suggestive of malignancy in the initial MRI examination. The diameter (mean +/- standard error) of the main pancreatic duct was 3.9 +/- 0.7 mm and that of the ectatic branch pancreatic duct was 36.0 +/- 9.1 mm. Twenty-three patients were prospectively followed for more than 36 months and 22 of them showed no findings suggestive of malignancy during follow-up periods ranging from 39 to 77 months (mean = 55 months). CONCLUSION: MRI was useful to identify nonmalignant IPMTs of the branch duct type, and close follow-up observation with serial MRI examinations may be appropriate in the management of such patients.
Authors: Anne Couvelard; Alain Sauvanet; Reza Kianmanesh; Pascal Hammel; Nathalie Colnot; Philippe Lévy; Philippe Ruszniewski; Pierre Bedossa; Jacques Belghiti Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Yazan S Khaled; Muhammed Mohsin; Kavi Fatania; Ada Yee; Robert Adair; Maria Sheridan; Christian Macutkiewicz; Amer Aldouri; Andrew M Smith Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-17