OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of frozen sectioning (FS) of the pancreatic transection margin and its influence on surgery during resection of intraductal papillary and mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative assessment of IPMN extension is difficult and transection margin is frequently tumoral on the surgical specimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FS was performed in 127 patients who underwent partial pancreatectomy for IPMN from 1996 to 2004, corresponding to 90 pancreaticoduodenectomies (1-4 successive FS; total = 132), 25 distal pancreatectomies (1-2 FS; total = 27), and 12 medial pancreatectomies (2-4 FS; total = 29). Dysplasia was graded in both main (MD) and branch ducts (BD), and pancreatectomy was extended if FS revealed at least IPMN adenoma on the MD or borderline IPMN on BD (defined as "significant" lesions). RESULTS: The 188 FS revealed that MD and BD epithelium comprised significant noninvasive lesions in 49 and 13 cases, respectively, and infiltrating carcinoma in 4 other ones. Definitive examination corroborated FS in 176 of 188 cases (94%). Altogether, 54 of 188 (29%) FS comprised significant lesions that resulted in 46 additional resections in 38 patients (30%). Eight patients did not have additional resection because of either high operative risk or preoperative diagnosis of noncurable infiltrating carcinoma. The 134 FS without significant lesions were associated with 7 additional resections mainly because of macroscopic suspicion of another tumor location. Conflicting results between FS and definitive examination resulted in inadequate extent of pancreatectomy in 4 patients (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Results of FS of the transection margin are confirmed by definitive examination in 94% of cases. According to our protocol, FS changes the extent of resection in 30% of patients and allows adequate resection in 97% of patients.
OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the accuracy of frozen sectioning (FS) of the pancreatic transection margin and its influence on surgery during resection of intraductal papillary and mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Preoperative assessment of IPMN extension is difficult and transection margin is frequently tumoral on the surgical specimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: FS was performed in 127 patients who underwent partial pancreatectomy for IPMN from 1996 to 2004, corresponding to 90 pancreaticoduodenectomies (1-4 successive FS; total = 132), 25 distal pancreatectomies (1-2 FS; total = 27), and 12 medial pancreatectomies (2-4 FS; total = 29). Dysplasia was graded in both main (MD) and branch ducts (BD), and pancreatectomy was extended if FS revealed at least IPMN adenoma on the MD or borderline IPMN on BD (defined as "significant" lesions). RESULTS: The 188 FS revealed that MD and BD epithelium comprised significant noninvasive lesions in 49 and 13 cases, respectively, and infiltrating carcinoma in 4 other ones. Definitive examination corroborated FS in 176 of 188 cases (94%). Altogether, 54 of 188 (29%) FS comprised significant lesions that resulted in 46 additional resections in 38 patients (30%). Eight patients did not have additional resection because of either high operative risk or preoperative diagnosis of noncurable infiltrating carcinoma. The 134 FS without significant lesions were associated with 7 additional resections mainly because of macroscopic suspicion of another tumor location. Conflicting results between FS and definitive examination resulted in inadequate extent of pancreatectomy in 4 patients (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Results of FS of the transection margin are confirmed by definitive examination in 94% of cases. According to our protocol, FS changes the extent of resection in 30% of patients and allows adequate resection in 97% of patients.
Authors: K Yamao; K Ohashi; T Nakamura; T Suzuki; Y Shimizu; Y Nakamura; Y Horibe; A Yanagisawa; A Nakao; Y Nimuara; Y Naito; T Hayakawa Journal: Hepatogastroenterology Date: 2000 Jul-Aug
Authors: Suresh T Chari; Dhiraj Yadav; Thomas C Smyrk; Eugene P DiMagno; Laurence J Miller; Massimo Raimondo; Jonathan E Clain; Ian A Norton; Randall K Pearson; Bret T Petersen; Maurits J Wiersema; Michael B Farnell; Michael G Sarr Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F Paye; A Sauvanet; B Terris; P Ponsot; V Vilgrain; P Hammel; P Bernades; P Ruszniewski; J Belghiti Journal: Surgery Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Yuichi Kitagawa; Trisha A Unger; Shari Taylor; Richard A Kozarek; L William Traverso Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Antonio Pea; Jun Yu; Neda Rezaee; Claudio Luchini; Jin He; Marco Dal Molin; James F Griffin; Helen Fedor; Shahriar Fesharakizadeh; Roberto Salvia; Matthew J Weiss; Claudio Bassi; John L Cameron; Lei Zheng; Aldo Scarpa; Ralph H Hruban; Anne Marie Lennon; Michael Goggins; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Volkan Adsay; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Toru Furukawa; Olca Basturk; Giuseppe Zamboni; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giuseppe Malleo; Salvatore Paiella; Christopher L Wolfgang; Hanno Matthaei; G Johan Offerhaus; Mustapha Adham; Marco J Bruno; Michelle D Reid; Alyssa Krasinskas; Günter Klöppel; Nobuyuki Ohike; Takuma Tajiri; Kee-Taek Jang; Juan Carlos Roa; Peter Allen; Carlos Fernández-del Castillo; Jin-Young Jang; David S Klimstra; Ralph H Hruban Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 12.969