Literature DB >> 14627938

Is all asthenopia the same?

James E Sheedy1, John N Hayes, Jon Engle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Any of several conditions can cause asthenopia. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the particular sensations or their location vary dependent on the symptom-inducing condition.
METHODS: Twenty subjects with good vision performed eight reading tasks in random order during different conditions. Each condition used different stimuli to induce asthenopia. The eight conditions were mixed astigmatism, close viewing distance, upward gaze, dry eyes, lens flipper, small font, glare, and flickering light. Subjects were asked to read until attaining a level of discomfort self-defined as "barely tolerable." After each task, subjects rated the magnitude of several symptom descriptors (burning, ache, strain, irritation, tearing, blurred vision, double vision, dryness, and headache) and their location.
RESULTS: Analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to determine that all of the individual symptom sensation measures (except blur) were significantly related (p values ranged from 0.003 to <0.0001) to the inducing condition. Principal factor analysis with orthogonal varimax rotation was used to test symptom by condition relationships and determined two latent factors, designated external and internal symptom factors (ESF and ISF), that related symptoms to inducing condition. The ESF pattern comprises burning, irritation, tearing, and dryness located in the front and bottom of the eye. ESF is caused by holding the eyelid open, glare, up gaze, small font, and flickering. ESF seems highly related to dry-eye symptoms. The ISF pattern comprises ache, strain, and headache located behind the eyes. ISF is caused by the close viewing distance, lens flipper, and mixed astigmatism conditions and is likely related to accommodative and vergence stress.
CONCLUSIONS: Symptom descriptors and locations were able to distinguish discomfort on the basis of causative condition. Results support two different symptom constellations and, hence, at least two different afferent pathways for symptoms of asthenopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627938     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200311000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  49 in total

Review 1.  Eye complaints in the office environment: precorneal tear film integrity influenced by eye blinking efficiency.

Authors:  P Wolkoff; J K Nøjgaard; P Troiano; B Piccoli
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Automatic glare removal in endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  Eric W Abel; Yuan Zhuo; Peter D Ross; Paul S White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Discomfort glare and psychological stress during computer work: subjective responses and associations between neck pain and trapezius muscle blood flow.

Authors:  Randi Mork; Helle K Falkenberg; Knut Inge Fostervold; Hanne-Mari Schiøtz Thorud
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  The rate of change of vergence-accommodation conflict affects visual discomfort.

Authors:  Joohwan Kim; David Kane; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Measuring near-induced transient myopia in college students with visual discomfort.

Authors:  Eric Borsting; Chinatsu Tosha; Chris Chase; William H Ridder
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 6.  Symptomatology associated with accommodative and binocular vision anomalies.

Authors:  Ángel García-Muñoz; Stela Carbonell-Bonete; Pilar Cacho-Martínez
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-07-15

7.  Light-induced trigeminal sensitization without central visual pathways: another mechanism for photophobia.

Authors:  Sarah Dolgonos; Haripriya Ayyala; Craig Evinger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  A survey of visually induced symptoms and associated factors in spectators of three dimensional stereoscopic movies.

Authors:  Angelo G Solimini; Alice Mannocci; Domitilla Di Thiene; Giuseppe La Torre
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Visual discomfort and depth-of-field.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Tingting Zhang; Harold T Nefs; Paul B Hibbard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-16

10.  Are there side effects to watching 3D movies? A prospective crossover observational study on visually induced motion sickness.

Authors:  Angelo G Solimini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.