Literature DB >> 14627538

Taste sensitivities to PROP and PTC vary independently in mice.

Theodore M Nelson1, Steven D Munger, John D Boughter.   

Abstract

Mammals use common mechanisms to detect, transduce and process taste stimulus information. For example, they share families of receptors that respond to amino acids, and sweet- and bitter-tasting stimuli. Nonetheless, it also clear that different species exhibit unique taste sensitivities that may reflect specific genetic variations. In humans, sensitivities to the chemically similar, bitter-tasting compounds 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) and phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) are heritable and strongly correlated, suggesting a common genetic basis. However, it is unknown whether PROP and PTC taste sensitivities are similarly correlated in mice. Here we report that PROP and PTC taste sensitivities vary independently between two inbred strains of mice. In brief-access taste tests C3HeB/FeJ (C3) and SWR/J (SW) mice possess similar taste sensitivity to PTC, while SW mice are significantly more sensitive to PROP than are C3 mice. In two-bottle preference tests, however, SW mice display greater aversion to both compounds. This discrepancy may be explained by the observation that SW mice consumed taste solutions at a greater rate during the intake test than did C3 mice. Therefore, PTC avoidance is correlated with the amount of PTC consumed in the intake tests rather than the concentration of PTC tested. These findings suggest that post-ingestive factors play a significant role in PTC avoidance during intake tests and highlight an important advantage of brief-access tests over intake tests in resolving the gustatory and post-ingestive contributions to taste-related behaviors. Most strikingly, these results demonstrate that in mice, unlike in humans, PTC and PROP taste sensitivities vary independently, thereby suggesting a subtle functional diversity of bitter-taste mechanisms across mammalian species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627538     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjg062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  31 in total

1.  Citric acid and quinine share perceived chemosensory features making oral discrimination difficult in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Clare M Mathes; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 2.  Taste receptor genes.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.848

Review 3.  Genetics of taste receptors.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Cailu Lin; Ichiro Matsumoto; Makoto Ohmoto; Danielle R Reed; Theodore M Nelson
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.116

4.  Taste Receptor Cells in Mice Express Receptors for the Hormone Adiponectin.

Authors:  Sean M Crosson; Andrew Marques; Peter Dib; Cedrick D Dotson; Steven D Munger; Sergei Zolotukhin
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Age-related changes in mouse taste bud morphology, hormone expression, and taste responsivity.

Authors:  Yu-Kyong Shin; Wei-na Cong; Huan Cai; Wook Kim; Stuart Maudsley; Josephine M Egan; Bronwen Martin
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Glucagon signaling modulates sweet taste responsiveness.

Authors:  Amanda E T Elson; Cedrick D Dotson; Josephine M Egan; Steven D Munger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Mouse nasal epithelial innate immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing molecules require taste signaling components.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Bei Chen; Kevin M Redding; Robert F Margolskee; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  Innate Immun       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.680

8.  Modulation of taste responsiveness by the satiation hormone peptide YY.

Authors:  Michael S La Sala; Maria D Hurtado; Alicia R Brown; Diego V Bohórquez; Rodger A Liddle; Herbert Herzog; Sergei Zolotukhin; Cedrick D Dotson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Vasoactive intestinal peptide-null mice demonstrate enhanced sweet taste preference, dysglycemia, and reduced taste bud leptin receptor expression.

Authors:  Bronwen Martin; Yu-Kyong Shin; Caitlin M White; Sunggoan Ji; Wook Kim; Olga D Carlson; Joshua K Napora; Wayne Chadwick; Megan Chapter; James A Waschek; Mark P Mattson; Stuart Maudsley; Josephine M Egan
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  T2R38 taste receptor polymorphisms underlie susceptibility to upper respiratory infection.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Guoxiang Xiong; Jennifer M Kofonow; Bei Chen; Anna Lysenko; Peihua Jiang; Valsamma Abraham; Laurel Doghramji; Nithin D Adappa; James N Palmer; David W Kennedy; Gary K Beauchamp; Paschalis-Thomas Doulias; Harry Ischiropoulos; James L Kreindler; Danielle R Reed; Noam A Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.