Literature DB >> 14627313

Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis.

R E Villavicencio1, T J Forbes, R L Thomas, R A Humes.   

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the phenomenon of pressure recovery in pediatric patients with aortic stenosis and also to evaluate how observed differences between catheter and Doppler gradients can be predicted by Doppler echocardiography. Doppler measurements of aortic valve stenosis gradients are known to overestimate observed gradients in the catheterization laboratory. Pressure recovery has been shown to be a contributing factor to this discrepancy. However, the clinical relevance of correcting Doppler gradients using the pressure recovery equation has not been evaluated in the pediatric population. Simultaneously obtained catheter and Doppler gradients were studied in 14 patients (range, 0.03-18 years; mean, 4.1 years) with aortic valve stenosis. A total of 23 data points were measured because 9 patients underwent balloon valvuloplasty and had both a pre- and a post-balloon valvuloplasty data point in the study. The catheter gradients were then compared to peak, mean, and pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients. Pressure recovery was calculated using a previously validated equation. As expected, measured echocardiographic continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients overestimated the observed catheter gradients (range, 16-93 mmHg; mean, 43 mmHg). The continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients, mean, and pressure recovery adjusted gradients were equally as good in correlating the observed catheter gradients to those obtained by Doppler echocardiography (r = 0.92). However, pressure recovery corrected Doppler gradients were in better agreement with catheter gradients than echocardiographic mean or peak Doppler gradients (95% limit of agreement: -9 to 19 mmHg for pressure recovery corrected gradients, -30 to 11 mmHg for mean Doppler gradients, and 2-83 mmHg for peak Doppler gradients). Measured continuous-wave peak Doppler gradients consistently overestimated catheter gradients. The noted differences may be predicted using the pressure recovery equation. Pressure recovery is a significant factor in children with aortic valve stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14627313     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-002-0361-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  19 in total

1.  Echocardiographic determination of aortic and pulmonary valve areas in subjects with normal hearts.

Authors:  H P Gutgesell; M French
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro.

Authors:  J Niederberger; H Schima; G Maurer; H Baumgartner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis--I. Theory and steady flow experiments.

Authors:  C Clark
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Can cardiac catheterization accurately assess the severity of aortic stenosis? An in vitro pulsatile flow study.

Authors:  H W Sung; P S Yu; C H Hsu; J C Hsu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: a manifestation of pressure recovery.

Authors:  H Baumgartner; H Schima; G Tulzer; P Kühn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  W K Laskey; W G Kussmaul
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Insights into catheter/Doppler discrepancies in congenital aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M S Lemler; L M Valdes-Cruz; R S Shandas; E G Cape
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Non-invasive determination of the systolic peak-to-peak gradient in children with aortic stenosis: validation of a mathematical model.

Authors:  V C Lima; E Zahn; C Houde; J Smallhorn; R M Freedom; L N Benson
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.093

10.  Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model.

Authors:  W Voelker; H Reul; T Stelzer; A Schmidt; K R Karsch
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children.

Authors:  Antonios P Vlahos; Gerald R Marx; Doff McElhinney; Stephen Oneill; Ioannis Goudevenos; Steven D Colan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 1.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.